en
|
es
|
fr
English
|
Español
|
Français
Sign up for an account
|
Sign In
The Convention
About the Convention
History of the Convention
Convention Text
List of Parties
Decisions
Global Biodiversity Outlook (GBO 3)
Convention Protocols
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety
Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-Sharing
Convention Bodies
Conference of the Parties (COP)
Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA)
Working Group on the Review of Implementation (WGRI)
Intergovernmental Committee for the Nagoya Protocol (ICNP)
Working Group on Article 8(j)
Working Group on Protected Areas
Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020
Key Elements
Aichi Biodiversity Targets
Implementation
United Nations Decade on Biodiversity 2011-2020
Mechanisms for Implementation
National Biodiversity Strategies & Action Plans
National Reports
Financial Resources & Mechanism
LifeWeb for Financing Protected Areas
Clearing-House Mechanism (CHM)
Cooperation & Partnerships
South-South Cooperation
Consortium of Scientific Partners
Rio Conventions
Biodiversity-related Conventions
Japan Biodiversity Fund
Partnership Agreements
Cartagena Protocol
The Cartagena Protocol
What's new
About the Protocol
Text of the Cartagena Protocol
Strategic Plan
Key Protocol Issues
Assessment and Review
Capacity Building
Compliance
Detection and Identification
Financial Mechanism
Handling, Transport, Packaging and Identification
Information sharing
Liability and Redress
Monitoring and Reporting
Public Awareness and Participation
Risk Assessment
Risk Management
Roster of Experts
Socio-economic Considerations
Parties
List of Parties
Becoming a Party
National Contacts
National Reports
Status of Contributions
COP-MOP (Governing Body)
COP-MOP Bureau
COP-MOP Meetings
COP-MOP Decisions
Activities and Documentation
Meetings and Documents
Notifications
Reports of the Executive Secretary
Resources
The Biosafety Clearing-House
Frequently Asked Questions
Media and Outreach
A video on the Cartagena Protocol
Search the BIRC
Publications
Protocols and decisions
Fact Sheets and Banners
Newsletter
Biosafety Technical Series
Other Publications
Nagoya – Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress
The Biosafety Clearing-House (BCH)
Nagoya Protocol
Programmes
Thematic Programmes
Agricultural Biodiversity
Dry and Sub-humid Land Biodiversity
Forest Biodiversity
Inland Waters Biodiversity
Island Biodiversity
Marine and Coastal Biodiversity
Mountain Biodiversity
Major Groups
Local Authorities
Parliamentarians
Business
Universities and the Scientific Community
Children & Youth
The Green Wave for Schools
Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs)
Cross-Cutting Issues
Biodiversity for Development
Climate Change and Biodiversity
Communication, Education and Public Awareness
Economics, Trade and Incentive Measures
Ecosystem Approach
Gender and Biodiversity
Global Strategy for Plant Conservation
Global Taxonomy Initiative
Health & Biodiversity
Impact Assessment
Identification, Monitoring, Indicators and Assessments
Invasive Alien Species
Liability and Redress - Article 14.2
Protected Areas
Sustainable Use of Biodiversity
Technology Transfer and Cooperation
Tourism and Biodiversity
Traditional Knowledge, Innovations and Practices - Article 8(j)
New & Emerging Issues
Information
News and Communications
CBD Announcements
Statements
Notifications
News Headlines on Biodiversity
Press Releases
RSS Feeds
Twitter
Facebook
Discussion Forums
National Information
Country Profiles
List of Parties
Lists of National Focal Points
National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAPs)
National Reports
Status of Contributions
Multimedia
Photo Gallery
Video Gallery
YouTube
General References
Decisions
Recommendations
Meetings
Library and Documents
Principles, Guidelines and Tools
Resources for Negotiators
ECOLEX - A Gateway to Biodiversity-Related Law
Case Studies
Related Websites
Partnership Agreements
Thematic Databases
Ecosystem Approach Sourcebook
Database on Climate Change Adaptation
Database on Incentive Measures
Database of Scientific Assessments
Database on Technology Transfer
Case Studies on Impact Assessment
Case Studies on Dry and Sub-Humid Land Biodiversity
ABS Measures Search Page
ABS Database on Capacity Building Projects
ABS Roster of Experts
Secretariat
About the Secretariat
Staff
Museum of Nature and Culture
Initiatives
Secretariat Documents
Employment Opportunities
Doing Business with the CBD
Information
News & Communications
Web Announcements
Statements
Notifications
News Headlines on Biodiversity
Press Releases
RSS Feeds
Twitter
Facebook
Discussion Forums
National Information
Country Profiles
List of Parties
Lists of National Focal Points
National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAPs)
National Reports
Status of Contributions
Multimedia
Video Gallery
YouTube
General References
Decisions
Recommendations
Meetings
Library and Documentation
Principles, Guidelines and Tools
Resources for Negotiators
ECOLEX - A Gateway to Biodiversity Law
Case Studies
Related Websites
Thematic Databases
Ecosystem Approach Sourcebook
Database on Climate Change Adaptation
Database on Incentive Measures
Database on Scientific Assessments
Database on Technology Transfer
Case Studies on Impact Assessment
Case Studies on Dry and Sub-Humid land Biodiversity
ABS Measures Search Page
ABS Database on Capacity Building Projects
ABS Roster of Experts
>
Information
>
COP-MOP Decision
Decisions
COP
COP-MOP
Recommendations
SBSTTA
WGRI
ICCP
COP-MOP Decisions
MOP 5
MOP 4
MOP 3
MOP 2
MOP 1
COP-MOP 5 Decisions
BS-V/1
BS-V/2
BS-V/3
BS-V/4
BS-V/5
BS-V/6
BS-V/7
BS-V/8
BS-V/9
BS-V/10
BS-V/11
BS-V/12
BS-V/13
BS-V/14
BS-V/15
BS-V/16
BS-V/17
MOP 5 Decision BS-V/8
BS-V/8.
Handling, transport, packaging and identification of living modified organisms: paragraph 2(a) of Article 18
The Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety,
Recalling
paragraph 2 (a) of Article 18 of the Protocol and its
decision BS-III/10
,
Noting
the limited experience gained to date in the implementation of paragraph 4 of
decision BS-III/10
,
Noting also
the importance of the identification of living modified organisms intended for direct use as food or feed, or for processing, in documentation accompanying their shipment,
Noting further
the importance of documentation and identification of living modified organisms intended for direct use as food or feed, or for processing, including for risk management purposes,
1.
Requests
Parties and
urges
other Governments to continue to take measures to ensure that the information required by paragraph 2 (a) of Article 18 and paragraph 4 of
decision BS-III/10
to identify living modified organisms intended for direct use as food or feed, or for processing, is incorporated into existing documentation accompanying the living modified organisms, as specified in paragraph 1 of
decision BS-III/10
;
2.
Urges
Parties to expedite the implementation of their biosafety regulatory frameworks and make available to the Biosafety Clearing-House any laws, regulations and guidelines for the implementation of the Protocol, and any changes to their regulatory requirements related to the identification and documentation of living modified organisms intended for direct use as food or feed, or for processing;
3.
Requests
Parties and
urges
other Governments to take measures that facilitate further implementation of
decision BS-III/10
, in particular its paragraph 4;
4.
Requests
Parties and encourages other Governments and relevant organizations to cooperate with and support developing country Parties and Parties with economies in transition to build capacity to implement the identification requirements of paragraph 2 (a) of Article 18 and related decisions;
5.
Encourages
Parties to develop domestic systems or use existing ones, as appropriate, to prevent imported living modified organisms intended for direct use as food or feed, or for processing, from being used for other purposes such as introduction into the environment;
6.
Decides
, taking into account the limited experience gained to date in the implementation of paragraph 4 of
decision BS-III/10
, to postpone the decision-taking referred to in paragraph 7 of
decision BS-III/10
until its seventh meeting. This decision-taking should also include consideration of the need for a stand-alone document, as referred to in paragraph 2 of
decision BS-III/10
;
7.
Requests
Parties and
invites
other Governments and relevant organizations to submit to the Executive Secretary, no later than six months prior to the seventh meeting of the Parties to the Protocol, further information on experience gained with the implementation of paragraph 4 of decision BS-III/10 as well as the present decision, including any information on obstacles that are encountered in the implementation of these decisions as well as specific capacity-building needs to implement these decisions, and
requests
the Executive Secretary to compile the information and prepare a synthesis report for consideration by the Parties at their seventh meeting.
Feedback
Site Map
Contact us
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Credits
© CBD Secretariat
Rate this page