en
|
es
|
fr
English
|
Español
|
Français
Sign up for an account
|
Sign In
The Convention
About the Convention
History of the Convention
Convention Text
List of Parties
Decisions
Global Biodiversity Outlook (GBO 3)
Convention Protocols
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety
Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-Sharing
Convention Bodies
Conference of the Parties (COP)
Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA)
Working Group on the Review of Implementation (WGRI)
Intergovernmental Committee for the Nagoya Protocol (ICNP)
Working Group on Article 8(j)
Working Group on Protected Areas
Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020
Key Elements
Aichi Biodiversity Targets
Implementation
United Nations Decade on Biodiversity 2011-2020
Mechanisms for Implementation
National Biodiversity Strategies & Action Plans
National Reports
Financial Resources & Mechanism
LifeWeb for Financing Protected Areas
Clearing-House Mechanism (CHM)
Cooperation & Partnerships
South-South Cooperation
Consortium of Scientific Partners
Rio Conventions
Biodiversity-related Conventions
Japan Biodiversity Fund
Partnership Agreements
Cartagena Protocol
The Cartagena Protocol
What's new
About the Protocol
Text of the Cartagena Protocol
Strategic Plan
Key Protocol Issues
Assessment and Review
Capacity Building
Compliance
Financial Mechanism
Handling, Transport, Packaging and Identification
Information sharing
Liability and Redress
Monitoring and Reporting
Public Awareness and Participation
Risk Assessment
Risk Management
Roster of Experts
Socio-economic Considerations
Parties
List of Parties
Becoming a Party
National Contacts
National Reports
Status of Contributions
COP-MOP (Governing Body)
COP-MOP Bureau
COP-MOP Meetings
COP-MOP Decisions
Activities and Documentation
Meetings and Documents
Notifications
Reports of the Executive Secretary
Resources
The Biosafety Clearing-House
Frequently Asked Questions
Media and Outreach
A video on the Cartagena Protocol
Search the BIRC
Publications
Protocols and decisions
Fact Sheets and Banners
Newsletter
Biosafety Technical Series
Other Publications
Nagoya – Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress
The Biosafety Clearing-House (BCH)
Nagoya Protocol
Programmes
Thematic Programmes
Agricultural Biodiversity
Dry and Sub-humid Land Biodiversity
Forest Biodiversity
Inland Waters Biodiversity
Island Biodiversity
Marine and Coastal Biodiversity
Mountain Biodiversity
Major Groups
Local Authorities
Parliamentarians
Business
Universities and the Scientific Community
Children & Youth
The Green Wave for Schools
Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs)
Cross-Cutting Issues
Biodiversity for Development
Climate Change and Biodiversity
Communication, Education and Public Awareness
Economics, Trade and Incentive Measures
Ecosystem Approach
Gender and Biodiversity
Global Strategy for Plant Conservation
Global Taxonomy Initiative
Health & Biodiversity
Impact Assessment
Identification, Monitoring, Indicators and Assessments
Invasive Alien Species
Liability and Redress - Article 14.2
Protected Areas
Sustainable Use of Biodiversity
Technology Transfer and Cooperation
Tourism and Biodiversity
Traditional Knowledge, Innovations and Practices - Article 8(j)
New & Emerging Issues
Information
News and Communications
CBD Announcements
Statements
Notifications
News Headlines on Biodiversity
Press Releases
RSS Feeds
Twitter
Facebook
Discussion Forums
National Information
Country Profiles
List of Parties
Lists of National Focal Points
National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAPs)
National Reports
Status of Contributions
Multimedia
Photo Gallery
Video Gallery
YouTube
General References
Decisions
Recommendations
Meetings
Library and Documents
Principles, Guidelines and Tools
Resources for Negotiators
ECOLEX - A Gateway to Biodiversity-Related Law
Case Studies
Related Websites
Partnership Agreements
Thematic Databases
Ecosystem Approach Sourcebook
Database on Climate Change Adaptation
Database on Incentive Measures
Database of Scientific Assessments
Database on Technology Transfer
Case Studies on Impact Assessment
Case Studies on Dry and Sub-Humid Land Biodiversity
ABS Measures Search Page
ABS Database on Capacity Building Projects
ABS Roster of Experts
Secretariat
About the Secretariat
Staff
Museum of Nature and Culture
Initiatives
Secretariat Documents
Employment Opportunities
Information
News & Communications
Web Announcements
Statements
Notifications
News Headlines on Biodiversity
Press Releases
RSS Feeds
Twitter
Facebook
Discussion Forums
National Information
Country Profiles
List of Parties
Lists of National Focal Points
National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAPs)
National Reports
Status of Contributions
Multimedia
Video Gallery
YouTube
General References
Decisions
Recommendations
Meetings
Library and Documentation
Principles, Guidelines and Tools
Resources for Negotiators
ECOLEX - A Gateway to Biodiversity Law
Case Studies
Related Websites
Thematic Databases
Ecosystem Approach Sourcebook
Database on Climate Change Adaptation
Database on Incentive Measures
Database on Scientific Assessments
Database on Technology Transfer
Case Studies on Impact Assessment
Case Studies on Dry and Sub-Humid land Biodiversity
ABS Measures Search Page
ABS Database on Capacity Building Projects
ABS Roster of Experts
>
Information
>
COP-MOP Decision
Decisions
COP
COP-MOP
Recommendations
SBSTTA
WGRI
ICCP
COP-MOP Decisions
MOP 5
MOP 4
MOP 3
MOP 2
MOP 1
COP-MOP 5 Decisions
BS-V/1
BS-V/2
BS-V/3
BS-V/4
BS-V/5
BS-V/6
BS-V/7
BS-V/8
BS-V/9
BS-V/10
BS-V/11
BS-V/12
BS-V/13
BS-V/14
BS-V/15
BS-V/16
BS-V/17
MOP 5 Decision BS-V/2
BS-V/2.
Operation and activities of the Biosafety Clearing-House
The Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety,
Welcoming
the improvements made to the Management Centre of the Biosafety Clearing-House and to the structure of the common formats for the submission of information,
Recalling
preambular paragraph 3 of
decision BS-II/13
on the importance of making information concerning the safe transfer, handling and use of living modified organisms available to different stakeholders in comprehensible formats and adapting awareness materials to local languages and situations,
Welcoming
the results of the Study of users and potential users of the Biosafety Clearing-House,
Welcoming also
the endorsement of the Project for Continued Enhancement of Building Capacity for Effective Participation in the Biosafety Clearing-House by the Global Environment Facility,
1.
Reminds
Parties of their obligations, and
invites
other Governments, to:
(a)
Provide to the Biosafety Clearing-House, in a timely manner, complete and accurate information on final decisions pertaining to living modified organisms and the risk assessment summaries regarding such decisions, as well as risk assessment summaries for all instances when requested by the Protocol including, inter alia, intentional introductions of living modified organisms into the environment for field trials regardless on whether or not the living modified organism will be subjected to future transboundary movements or commercialization;
(b)
Cooperate fully with the Secretariat in its efforts to maintain complete information in the Biosafety Clearing-House;
(c)
Indicate and document specific obstacles preventing or hindering the effective use of the Biosafety Clearing-House;
2.
Invites
Parties, other Governments and users of the Biosafety Clearing-House to continue making relevant biosafety information available through the Biosafety Information Resource Centre;
3.
Also invites
Parties, other Governments and relevant organizations to consider the implementation of the LMO quick-link tool by their relevant national agencies when reference is made to a living modified organism;
4.
Requests
Parties and
invites
other Governments and relevant organizations to submit to the Executive Secretary views on the changes made during the last intersessional period to the (i) common formats; (ii) registration procedure; (iii) tools for the analysis of search results; and (iv) graphical representations of data, and requests the Executive Secretary to take these views into account for future improvements of the Biosafety Clearing-House;
5.
Requests
the Executive Secretary to continue providing assistance and information to Parties on how to submit and retrieve information from the central portal of the Biosafety Clearing-House and to explore innovative ways for assisting Parties in making information in the Biosafety Clearing-House available also in languages other than the official United Nations languages;
6.
Also requests
the Executive Secretary to facilitate, through the Biosafety Clearing-House, online forums and conferences on topics relevant to biosafety and the implementation of the Protocol, in particular to facilitate the common understanding of the use of certain terms of Article 20 of the Protocol and of the type of information that should be made available in risk assessments submitted to the Biosafety Clearing-House;
7.
Requests
Parties and
invites
other Governments and relevant organizations to participate actively in the activities mentioned in paragraph 6 above with the view to reaching an adequate level of regional participation and ensuring that the results of the discussion may be taken into account;
8.
Requests
the Executive Secretary to increase the involvement of Biosafety Clearing-House national focal points by promoting,
inter alia
, regular exchange of information and online discussions and to explore innovative ways for gathering views from Parties where internet connectivity is limited;
9.
Invites
relevant United Nations bodies and international organizations to enhance cooperation and avoid duplication regarding the provision of information on living modified organisms and
requests
the Executive Secretary to explore ways to develop a mechanism for harmonizing similar data from various other sources (e.g. the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) with the view to avoiding duplication of efforts and improving the utility of the Biosafety Clearing-House as a global mechanism for information-sharing on biosafety;
10.
Invites
Parties, other Governments and relevant international organizations to provide funding and to strengthen and expand initiatives aimed at overcoming obstacles encountered by developing country Parties, in particular the least developed and small island developing States among them, and Parties with economies in transition, in meeting their obligations under Article 20 of the Protocol, including capacity-building and the development of infrastructure necessary for facilitating the retrieval and submission of information to the Biosafety Clearing-House;
11.
Requests
Parties and
invites
other Governments to identify their needs regarding national Biosafety Clearing-House nodes in a detailed manner through the Biosafety Clearing-House, and
requests
the United Nations Environment Programme, through the ongoing Project for Continued Enhancement of Building Capacity for Effective Participation in the Biosafety Clearing-House (hereinafter referred to as the BCH-II project), and the Executive Secretary to provide the necessary support for the needs identified;
12.
Encourages
Parties, relevant United Nations bodies and relevant international organizations to continue training activities at the national and regional levels and
welcomes
the offers by the Republic of Korea and the Islamic Republic of Iran to host sub-regional workshops in 2011 in cooperation with relevant international organizations;
13.
Invites
Parties, other Governments and relevant organizations to make funds available for the operationalization of paragraph 5 above for the benefit of developing country Parties, in particular the least developed and small island developing States among them, and Parties with economies in transition;
14.
Requests
the United Nations Environment Programme, through the BCH-II project, to promote capacity-building activities at the global, regional and, in particular, sub-regional levels in order to increase exchange of experiences among different countries;
15.
Further requests
the United Nations Environment Programme, through the BCH II project, to produce in collaboration with the Executive Secretary, further guidance on the Biosafety Clearing-House with special attention to the various target stakeholders (e.g. government officials, media, the general public, members of civil-society organizations, etc.) and to categories of potential users that have been identified as being least aware of the Biosafety Clearing-House.
Feedback
Site Map
Contact us
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Credits
© CBD Secretariat
Rate this page