en
|
es
|
fr
English
|
Español
|
Français
Sign up for an account
|
Sign In
The Convention
About the Convention
History of the Convention
Convention Text
List of Parties
Decisions
Global Biodiversity Outlook (GBO 3)
Convention Protocols
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety
Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-Sharing
Convention Bodies
Conference of the Parties (COP)
Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA)
Working Group on the Review of Implementation (WGRI)
Intergovernmental Committee for the Nagoya Protocol (ICNP)
Working Group on Article 8(j)
Working Group on Protected Areas
Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020
Key Elements
Aichi Biodiversity Targets
Implementation
United Nations Decade on Biodiversity 2011-2020
Mechanisms for Implementation
National Biodiversity Strategies & Action Plans
National Reports
Financial Resources & Mechanism
LifeWeb for Financing Protected Areas
Clearing-House Mechanism (CHM)
Cooperation & Partnerships
South-South Cooperation
Consortium of Scientific Partners
Rio Conventions
Biodiversity-related Conventions
Japan Biodiversity Fund
Partnership Agreements
Cartagena Protocol
The Cartagena Protocol
What's new
About the Protocol
Text of the Cartagena Protocol
Strategic Plan
Key Protocol Issues
Assessment and Review
Capacity Building
Compliance
Detection and Identification
Financial Mechanism
Handling, Transport, Packaging and Identification
Information sharing
Liability and Redress
Monitoring and Reporting
Public Awareness and Participation
Risk Assessment
Risk Management
Roster of Experts
Socio-economic Considerations
Parties
List of Parties
Becoming a Party
National Contacts
National Reports
Status of Contributions
COP-MOP (Governing Body)
COP-MOP Bureau
COP-MOP Meetings
COP-MOP Decisions
Activities and Documentation
Meetings and Documents
Notifications
Reports of the Executive Secretary
Resources
The Biosafety Clearing-House
Frequently Asked Questions
Media and Outreach
A video on the Cartagena Protocol
Search the BIRC
Publications
Protocols and decisions
Fact Sheets and Banners
Newsletter
Biosafety Technical Series
Other Publications
Nagoya – Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress
The Biosafety Clearing-House (BCH)
Nagoya Protocol
Programmes
Thematic Programmes
Agricultural Biodiversity
Dry and Sub-humid Land Biodiversity
Forest Biodiversity
Inland Waters Biodiversity
Island Biodiversity
Marine and Coastal Biodiversity
Mountain Biodiversity
Major Groups
Local Authorities
Parliamentarians
Business
Universities and the Scientific Community
Children & Youth
The Green Wave for Schools
Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs)
Cross-Cutting Issues
Biodiversity for Development
Climate Change and Biodiversity
Communication, Education and Public Awareness
Economics, Trade and Incentive Measures
Ecosystem Approach
Gender and Biodiversity
Global Strategy for Plant Conservation
Global Taxonomy Initiative
Health & Biodiversity
Impact Assessment
Identification, Monitoring, Indicators and Assessments
Invasive Alien Species
Liability and Redress - Article 14.2
Protected Areas
Sustainable Use of Biodiversity
Technology Transfer and Cooperation
Tourism and Biodiversity
Traditional Knowledge, Innovations and Practices - Article 8(j)
New & Emerging Issues
Information
News and Communications
CBD Announcements
Statements
Notifications
News Headlines on Biodiversity
Press Releases
RSS Feeds
Twitter
Facebook
Discussion Forums
National Information
Country Profiles
List of Parties
Lists of National Focal Points
National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAPs)
National Reports
Status of Contributions
Multimedia
Photo Gallery
Video Gallery
YouTube
General References
Decisions
Recommendations
Meetings
Library and Documents
Principles, Guidelines and Tools
Resources for Negotiators
ECOLEX - A Gateway to Biodiversity-Related Law
Case Studies
Related Websites
Partnership Agreements
Thematic Databases
Ecosystem Approach Sourcebook
Database on Climate Change Adaptation
Database on Incentive Measures
Database of Scientific Assessments
Database on Technology Transfer
Case Studies on Impact Assessment
Case Studies on Dry and Sub-Humid Land Biodiversity
ABS Measures Search Page
ABS Database on Capacity Building Projects
ABS Roster of Experts
Secretariat
About the Secretariat
Staff
Museum of Nature and Culture
Initiatives
Secretariat Documents
Employment Opportunities
Doing Business with the CBD
Information
News & Communications
Web Announcements
Statements
Notifications
News Headlines on Biodiversity
Press Releases
RSS Feeds
Twitter
Facebook
Discussion Forums
National Information
Country Profiles
List of Parties
Lists of National Focal Points
National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAPs)
National Reports
Status of Contributions
Multimedia
Video Gallery
YouTube
General References
Decisions
Recommendations
Meetings
Library and Documentation
Principles, Guidelines and Tools
Resources for Negotiators
ECOLEX - A Gateway to Biodiversity Law
Case Studies
Related Websites
Thematic Databases
Ecosystem Approach Sourcebook
Database on Climate Change Adaptation
Database on Incentive Measures
Database on Scientific Assessments
Database on Technology Transfer
Case Studies on Impact Assessment
Case Studies on Dry and Sub-Humid land Biodiversity
ABS Measures Search Page
ABS Database on Capacity Building Projects
ABS Roster of Experts
>
Information
>
COP-MOP Decision
Decisions
COP
COP-MOP
Recommendations
SBSTTA
WGRI
ICCP
COP-MOP Decisions
MOP 5
MOP 4
MOP 3
MOP 2
MOP 1
COP-MOP 5 Decisions
BS-V/1
BS-V/2
BS-V/3
BS-V/4
BS-V/5
BS-V/6
BS-V/7
BS-V/8
BS-V/9
BS-V/10
BS-V/11
BS-V/12
BS-V/13
BS-V/14
BS-V/15
BS-V/16
BS-V/17
MOP 5 Decision BS-V/15
BS-V/15.
Assessment and review (Article 35)
The Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety,
Recalling
Article 35 of the Protocol which requires the evaluation of the effectiveness of the Protocol, including an assessment of its procedures and annexes, to be undertaken at least every five years,
Recognizing
that the first assessment and review, which was to be conducted in 2008, could not lead to a meaningful evaluation of the effectiveness of the Protocol due to the absence of a methodological approach and lack of sufficient experience in the implementation of the Protocol,
Recalling
decision BS-IV/15 which requested the Executive Secretary to develop a methodological approach, draft criteria or indicators that could contribute to an effective second assessment and review of the Protocol,
1.
Decides
:
(a)
That the scope of the second assessment and review of the effectiveness of the Protocol focus primarily on evaluating the status of implementation of core elements of the Protocol as identified in the annex below;
(b)
That the evaluation should be based on information on the implementation of the Protocol gathered through the second national reports, the Biosafety Clearing-House, information that might be made available through the Compliance Committee in relation to its functions to review general issues of compliance, the capacity-building coordination mechanism and other relevant processes and organizations;
2.
Requests
the Executive Secretary to collect and compile information on the implementation of the Protocol and to commission the analysis of such compilation of information with a view to facilitating the second assessment and review of the effectiveness of the Protocol;
3.
Decides also
:
(a)
To establish a regionally balanced ad hoc technical expert group, subject to the availability of funds, to: (i) review the analysis of information referred to in paragraph 2 above; and (ii) submit its recommendations to the sixth meeting of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties for its consideration; and
(b)
That the third assessment and review of the Protocol be conducted in conjunction with the mid term review of the implementation of the Strategic Plan at the eighth meeting of the Parties, using, among other things, information collected through the third national reports;
4.
Urges
Parties and
invites
other Governments and relevant international organizations to contribute, as appropriate, to the data collection processes by completing and submitting, in a timely manner, national reports, or by responding to a questionnaire and providing complete information on the implementation of the Protocol.
Annex
ELEMENTS AND CORRESPONDING INDICATORS FOR SECOND ASSESSMENT AND REVIEW
A.
Coverage
Element 1. Geographic coverage of the Protocol and Protocols coverage of transboundary movements of LMOs:
(a)
Number of Parties to the Protocol;
(b)
Number of Parties that have designated national focal points;
(c)
Number of Parties submitting timely national reports on their implementation of the Protocol;
(d)
Number of Parties importing LMOs from non-Parties;
(e)
Number of Parties exporting LMOs to non-Parties.
B.
Domestic implementation of core procedures and annexes
Element 2. AIA procedures (or domestic regulatory frameworks consistent with the Protocol), in accordance with the Protocol, are established for the transboundary movement of LMOs for intentional introduction into the environment:
(a)
Number of Parties that have put in place laws and regulations and/or administrative measures for operation of the AIA procedure;
(b)
Number of Parties that have adopted a domestic regulatory framework consistent with the Protocol as regards the transboundary movement of LMOs for intentional introduction into the environment;
(c)
Number of Parties that have designated competent national authorities;
(d)
Number of Parties importing or exporting LMOs that do not have relevant laws and regulations in place governing transboundary movements of LMOs for intentional introduction into the environment;
(e)
Regional trends in adopting AIA procedures or domestic regulatory frameworks consistent with the Protocol.
Element 3. AIA procedures (or domestic regulatory framework consistent with the Protocol) for the transboundary movement of LMOs for intentional introduction into the environment are operational and functioning:
(a)
Number of Parties with domestic institutional and administrative (decision-making) arrangements in place to deal with AIA applications;
(b)
Number of Parties with a budgetary allocation for the operation of their national biosafety framework;
(c)
Number of Parties with permanent staff in place to administer their national biosafety frameworks (including AIA applications);
(d)
Number of Parties that have processed AIA applications and reached decisions on import;
(e)
Regional trends in operation and functioning of AIA procedures.
Element 4. Procedures for decision-making in relation to transboundary movements of living modified organisms intended for direct use as food or feed, or for processing (LMO-FFPs) are established and operational:
(a)
Number of Parties that have taken final decisions regarding domestic use, including placing on the market, of LMO-FFPs that may be subject to transboundary movement;
(b)
Number of Parties with a decision-making procedure specific to the import of LMO FFPs.
Element 5. Risk assessment procedures for LMOs are established and operational:
(a)
Number of Parties with risk assessment guidance in place for LMOs;
(b)
Number of Parties that have conducted risk assessments as part of a decision-making process regarding an LMO;
(c)
Number of Parties with an advisory committee or other arrangements in place for conducting or reviewing risk assessment;
(d)
Number of decisions in the Biosafety Clearing-House accompanied by a summary of the risk assessment of the LMO;
(e)
Number of Parties with the necessary domestic capacity to conduct risk assessment;
(f)
Number of Parties reporting having used Annex III of the Protocol or any other guidance on risk assessment agreed to by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Protocol;
(g)
Regional trends in relation to risk assessment capacity.
Element 6. Procedures for the establishment of appropriate LMO risk management measures and monitoring are established and operational:
(a)
Number of Parties that have authorized introductions of LMOs into the environment and that have requirements and/or procedures in place and enforced to regulate, manage and control risks identified in risk assessments;
(b)
Number of Parties with capacity to detect and identify the presence of LMOs;
(c)
Regional trends in relation to risk management capacity.
Element 7. Procedures for identifying and addressing illegal transboundary movements of LMOs are in place and operational:
(a)
Number of Parties with domestic measures to prevent and penalize illegal transboundary movements, including through the regulation of transit and contained use;
(b)
Number of Parties reporting having received information concerning cases of illegal transboundary movements of an LMO to or from territories under its jurisdiction;
(c)
Number of Parties with capacity to detect illegal transboundary movements of LMOs (e.g. personnel, technical capacity).
Element 8. Procedures for preventing, identifying and addressing unintentional transboundary movements of LMOs are established and operational, including notification procedures and emergency measures:
(a)
Number of Parties having notified to the Biosafety Clearing-House their contact points regarding unintentional transboundary movement of LMOs in accordance with Article 17;
(b)
Number of Parties with a mechanism in place for notifying potentially affected States of actual or potential unintentional transboundary movements of LMOs;
(c)
Number of instances of unintentional transboundary movements identified;
(d)
Number of Parties with a mechanism to identify and determine significant adverse effects on biological diversity of any unintentional transboundary movements of LMOs;
Element 9. Appropriate requirements are established and implemented in relation to the Protocols requirements on the handling, transport, packaging and identification of LMOs:
(a)
Number of Parties with requirements for handling, transport, packaging and identification of LMOs in place consistent with Article 18 of the Protocol and relevant subsequent decisions of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Protocol for:
(i)
Contained use;
(ii)
Intentional introduction into the environment;
(iii)
LMO-FFPs.
Element 10. Procedures for notification of required information to the Biosafety Clearing-House are established and operational:
(a)
Number of Parties that have allocated responsibilities for notification of information to the Biosafety Clearing House;
(b)
Number of Parties that have in place systems for the management of biosafety information necessary for the implementation of the Protocol.
Element 11. Procedures and measures for promoting public awareness are being implemented:
(a)
Number of Parties implementing public-awareness programmes or activities;
(b)
Number of Parties providing for some level of public participation in decision-making processes on LMOs.
C.
International level procedures and mechanisms
Element 12. Capacity-building Action Plan being effectively implemented:
(a)
Amount of funding provided or received for supporting biosafety capacity-building activities and the impacts resulting from such funding.
(b)
Number of Parties seeking assistance to be able to use experts from the roster of experts and number of Parties actually receiving such assistance;
(c)
Number of Parties reporting using local expertise to undertake or review risk assessments and other activities relating to the implementation of the Protocol.
Element 13. Compliance Committee is functioning:
(a)
Parties raise issues with the Compliance Committee concerning their own compliance with Protocol obligations;
(b)
Compliance Committee has decision-making rules of procedure in place.
Element 14. The Biosafety Clearing-House is operational and accessible:
(a)
Number of Parties and other users accessing the Biosafety Clearing-House on a regular basis, i.e. at least once a month;
(b)
Number of Parties reporting difficulties accessing or using the Biosafety Clearing-House;
(c)
Extent to which information on the Biosafety Clearing-House is reliable and up to date.
D.
Impacts of transboundary movements of LMOs on biological diversity, taking also into account risks to human health
Element 15. Consideration should be given to the work on biodiversity indicators in the context of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
Feedback
Site Map
Contact us
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Credits
© CBD Secretariat
Rate this page