Sign up for an account
|
Sign In
The Convention
About the Convention
History of the Convention
Convention Text
List of Parties
Decisions
Global Biodiversity Outlook (GBO 3)
Convention Protocols
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety
Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-Sharing
Convention Bodies
Conference of the Parties (COP)
Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA)
Working Group on the Review of Implementation (WGRI)
Intergovernmental Committee for the Nagoya Protocol (ICNP)
Working Group on Article 8(j)
Working Group on Protected Areas
Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020
Key Elements
Aichi Biodiversity Targets
Implementation
United Nations Decade on Biodiversity 2011-2020
Mechanisms for Implementation
National Biodiversity Strategies & Action Plans
National Reports
Financial Resources & Mechanism
LifeWeb for Financing Protected Areas
Clearing-House Mechanism (CHM)
Cooperation & Partnerships
South-South Cooperation
Consortium of Scientific Partners
Rio Conventions
Biodiversity-related Conventions
Japan Biodiversity Fund
Partnership Agreements
Cartagena Protocol
The Cartagena Protocol
What's new
About the Protocol
Text of the Cartagena Protocol
Strategic Plan
Key Protocol Issues
Assessment and Review
Capacity Building
Compliance
Financial Mechanism
Handling, Transport, Packaging and Identification
Information sharing
Liability and Redress
Monitoring and Reporting
Public Awareness and Participation
Risk Assessment
Risk Management
Roster of Experts
Socio-economic Considerations
Parties
List of Parties
Becoming a Party
National Contacts
National Reports
Status of Contributions
COP-MOP (Governing Body)
COP-MOP Bureau
COP-MOP Meetings
COP-MOP Decisions
Activities and Documentation
Meetings and Documents
Notifications
Reports of the Executive Secretary
Resources
The Biosafety Clearing-House
Frequently Asked Questions
Media and Outreach
A video on the Cartagena Protocol
Search the BIRC
Publications
Protocols and decisions
Fact Sheets and Banners
Newsletter
Biosafety Technical Series
Other Publications
Nagoya – Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress
The Biosafety Clearing-House (BCH)
Nagoya Protocol
Programmes
Thematic Programmes
Agricultural Biodiversity
Dry and Sub-humid Land Biodiversity
Forest Biodiversity
Inland Waters Biodiversity
Island Biodiversity
Marine and Coastal Biodiversity
Mountain Biodiversity
Major Groups
Local Authorities
Parliamentarians
Business
Universities and the Scientific Community
Children & Youth
The Green Wave for Schools
Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs)
Cross-Cutting Issues
Biodiversity for Development
Climate Change and Biodiversity
Communication, Education and Public Awareness
Economics, Trade and Incentive Measures
Ecosystem Approach
Gender and Biodiversity
Global Strategy for Plant Conservation
Global Taxonomy Initiative
Health & Biodiversity
Impact Assessment
Identification, Monitoring, Indicators and Assessments
Invasive Alien Species
Liability and Redress - Article 14.2
Protected Areas
Sustainable Use of Biodiversity
Technology Transfer and Cooperation
Tourism and Biodiversity
Traditional Knowledge, Innovations and Practices - Article 8(j)
New & Emerging Issues
Information
News and Communications
CBD Announcements
Statements
Notifications
News Headlines on Biodiversity
Press Releases
RSS Feeds
Twitter
Facebook
Discussion Forums
National Information
Country Profiles
List of Parties
Lists of National Focal Points
National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAPs)
National Reports
Status of Contributions
Multimedia
Photo Gallery
Video Gallery
YouTube
General References
Decisions
Recommendations
Meetings
Library and Documents
Principles, Guidelines and Tools
Resources for Negotiators
ECOLEX - A Gateway to Biodiversity-Related Law
Case Studies
Related Websites
Partnership Agreements
Thematic Databases
Ecosystem Approach Sourcebook
Database on Climate Change Adaptation
Database on Incentive Measures
Database of Scientific Assessments
Database on Technology Transfer
Case Studies on Impact Assessment
Case Studies on Dry and Sub-Humid Land Biodiversity
ABS Measures Search Page
ABS Database on Capacity Building Projects
ABS Roster of Experts
Secretariat
About the Secretariat
Staff
Museum of Nature and Culture
Initiatives
Secretariat Documents
Employment Opportunities
Gender and Biodiversity
Introduction
About Gender Mainstreaming
About Gender and Biodiversity
What is Gender and the Environment?
What is Gender and Biodiversity?
Why is it Important?
Programme
Background
COP Decision
Documents
Implementation
What We Do
Current Activities
Related Information
Related Websites
News Items
Notifications
Past and Upcoming Events
>
Programmes
>
Gender and Biodiversity
>
Programme
>
COP Decision
>
V. Conclusion
COP Decision Contents
Background
Methodology
Gender Plan of Action
Implementation of the Gender Plan of Action
Conclusion
Annex I. Acronyms
Annex II. Legal Framework in Relation to Gender and Biodiversity
Annex III. Terms of Reference Gender Focal Points UNEP
Annex IV. Gender Related Terminology
V. Conclusion
73. The present Gender Plan of Action is the first attempt to mainstream gender comprehensively throughout the organization. The Convention on Biological Diversity is at a considerable advantage in this respect, because the methodology outlined in the Plan of Action draws on recommendations resulting from other experiences in gender mainstreaming both inside and outside of the United Nations system. Thus, in implementing the Gender Plan of Action, the Convention on Biological Diversity will learn from and build on previous successes and challenges.
74. The present Gender Plan of Action recommends a number of actions be taken by the Convention on Biological Diversity in the realm of gender equality and biodiversity. There are some specific conditions that may prevent the comprehensive mainstreaming of gender equality in the Convention on Biological Diversity, and other conditions that would facilitate the success of gender mainstreaming. Both sets of conditions are outlined below to inform the implementation of the present Plan of Action.
A. Conditions that prevent gender mainstreaming
2
/
75. The following conditions may obstruct efforts to mainstream gender equality in activities of the Convention on Biological Diversity:
A hostile or indifferent institutional culture;
“Ghettoization” of gender;
A failure to highlight the construction of male as well as female gender identities, and the impact of changing gender roles and relations on men and masculinity, in any gender mainstreaming initiative;
A failure to connect organisational (internal) gender mainstreaming efforts to broader political, social, economic and environmental realities;
Framing of gender mainstreaming as a single and finite target, rather than a long-term undertaking, requiring extensive capacity-building and organizational change; and
Unavailability of sex-disaggregated data, and inadequacies in indicators, data and analyses that would otherwise reveal the gendered dimensions of issues.
B. Conditions that facilitate successful gender mainstreaming
76. The following conditions may facilitate efforts to mainstream gender equality in activities of the Convention on Biological Diversity:
An institutional culture that is open to gender perspective and willing to undertake the self assessment necessary to overcome obstacles to the mainstreaming of a gender perspective;
The presence of external and internal pressures to undertake gender mainstreaming and responsiveness to those pressures;
Identification of gender-mainstreaming as a cross-cutting responsibility;
An understanding that gender mainstreaming is a continuous and evolving undertaking;
Careful and consistent use of available sex-differentiated data, indicators and analysis and deployment of adequate resources to support their collection.
Accountability (including real consequences) for failures to implement agreed gender mainstreaming policies and practices routinely; and
Political commitment to the goal of securing gender equality on the part of the Executive Secretary and the leadership at the highest levels.
77. The present Plan of Action is not a static document and will continue to evolve according to changing institutional, political, and global and regional realities. It is most likely that the United Nations reform process will, once completed, require the Plan to be revisited and updated. The Plan will serve as a direct input into annual work plans developed by the various divisions and units of the Convention on Biological Diversity, and these work plans are expected to integrate elements of the Plan gradually.
2
/ Adapted from Seager & Hartmann, 2005.
Previous:
Implementation of the Gender Plan of Action
Next:
Annex I. Acronyms
Feedback
Site Map
Contact us
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Credits
© CBD Secretariat
Rate this page