Sign up for an account
|
Sign In
The Convention
About the Convention
History of the Convention
Convention Text
List of Parties
Decisions
Global Biodiversity Outlook (GBO 3)
Convention Protocols
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety
Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-Sharing
Convention Bodies
Conference of the Parties (COP)
Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA)
Working Group on the Review of Implementation (WGRI)
Intergovernmental Committee for the Nagoya Protocol (ICNP)
Working Group on Article 8(j)
Working Group on Protected Areas
Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020
Key Elements
Aichi Biodiversity Targets
Implementation
United Nations Decade on Biodiversity 2011-2020
Mechanisms for Implementation
National Biodiversity Strategies & Action Plans
National Reports
Financial Resources & Mechanism
LifeWeb for Financing Protected Areas
Clearing-House Mechanism (CHM)
Cooperation & Partnerships
South-South Cooperation
Consortium of Scientific Partners
Rio Conventions
Biodiversity-related Conventions
Japan Biodiversity Fund
Partnership Agreements
Cartagena Protocol
The Cartagena Protocol
What's new
About the Protocol
Text of the Cartagena Protocol
Strategic Plan
Key Protocol Issues
Assessment and Review
Capacity Building
Compliance
Financial Mechanism
Handling, Transport, Packaging and Identification
Information sharing
Liability and Redress
Monitoring and Reporting
Public Awareness and Participation
Risk Assessment
Risk Management
Roster of Experts
Socio-economic Considerations
Parties
List of Parties
Becoming a Party
National Contacts
National Reports
Status of Contributions
COP-MOP (Governing Body)
COP-MOP Bureau
COP-MOP Meetings
COP-MOP Decisions
Activities and Documentation
Meetings and Documents
Notifications
Reports of the Executive Secretary
Resources
The Biosafety Clearing-House
Frequently Asked Questions
Media and Outreach
A video on the Cartagena Protocol
Search the BIRC
Publications
Protocols and decisions
Fact Sheets and Banners
Newsletter
Biosafety Technical Series
Other Publications
Nagoya – Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress
The Biosafety Clearing-House (BCH)
Nagoya Protocol
Programmes
Thematic Programmes
Agricultural Biodiversity
Dry and Sub-humid Land Biodiversity
Forest Biodiversity
Inland Waters Biodiversity
Island Biodiversity
Marine and Coastal Biodiversity
Mountain Biodiversity
Major Groups
Local Authorities
Parliamentarians
Business
Universities and the Scientific Community
Children & Youth
The Green Wave for Schools
Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs)
Cross-Cutting Issues
Biodiversity for Development
Climate Change and Biodiversity
Communication, Education and Public Awareness
Economics, Trade and Incentive Measures
Ecosystem Approach
Gender and Biodiversity
Global Strategy for Plant Conservation
Global Taxonomy Initiative
Health & Biodiversity
Impact Assessment
Identification, Monitoring, Indicators and Assessments
Invasive Alien Species
Liability and Redress - Article 14.2
Protected Areas
Sustainable Use of Biodiversity
Technology Transfer and Cooperation
Tourism and Biodiversity
Traditional Knowledge, Innovations and Practices - Article 8(j)
New & Emerging Issues
Information
News and Communications
CBD Announcements
Statements
Notifications
News Headlines on Biodiversity
Press Releases
RSS Feeds
Twitter
Facebook
Discussion Forums
National Information
Country Profiles
List of Parties
Lists of National Focal Points
National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAPs)
National Reports
Status of Contributions
Multimedia
Photo Gallery
Video Gallery
YouTube
General References
Decisions
Recommendations
Meetings
Library and Documents
Principles, Guidelines and Tools
Resources for Negotiators
ECOLEX - A Gateway to Biodiversity-Related Law
Case Studies
Related Websites
Partnership Agreements
Thematic Databases
Ecosystem Approach Sourcebook
Database on Climate Change Adaptation
Database on Incentive Measures
Database of Scientific Assessments
Database on Technology Transfer
Case Studies on Impact Assessment
Case Studies on Dry and Sub-Humid Land Biodiversity
ABS Measures Search Page
ABS Database on Capacity Building Projects
ABS Roster of Experts
Secretariat
About the Secretariat
Staff
Museum of Nature and Culture
Initiatives
Secretariat Documents
Employment Opportunities
Gender and Biodiversity
Introduction
About Gender Mainstreaming
About Gender and Biodiversity
What is Gender and the Environment?
What is Gender and Biodiversity?
Why is it Important?
Programme
Background
COP Decision
Documents
Implementation
What We Do
Current Activities
Related Information
Related Websites
News Items
Notifications
Past and Upcoming Events
>
Programmes
>
Gender and Biodiversity
>
Programme
>
COP Decision
>
Annex IV. Gender Related Terminology
COP Decision Contents
Background
Methodology
Gender Plan of Action
Implementation of the Gender Plan of Action
Conclusion
Annex I. Acronyms
Annex II. Legal Framework in Relation to Gender and Biodiversity
Annex III. Terms of Reference Gender Focal Points UNEP
Annex IV. Gender Related Terminology
Annex IV. Gender Related Terminology
Access
1. Access to resources implies that women are able to use and benefit from specific resources (including material, financial, human, social and political ones).
Control
2. Control over resources implies that women can obtain access to a resource as and can also make decisions about the use of that resource. For example, control over land means that women can access land (use it), can own land (can be the legal title-holders), and can make decisions about whether to sell or rent the land.
Empowerment
3. Empowerment implies people – both women and men – taking control over their lives by setting their own agendas, gaining skills (or having their own skills and knowledge recognized), increasing their self confidence, solving problems, and developing self-reliance. It is both a process and an outcome. Empowerment implies an expansion in women's ability to make strategic life choices in a context where this ability was previously denied to them.
Gender
4. The term gender refers to the social roles and relations between women and men. This includes the different responsibilities of women and men in a given culture or location. Unlike the sex of men or women, which is biologically determined, the gender roles of women and men are socially constructed and such roles can change over time and vary according to geographic location and social context.
Gender-blind
5. An approach/strategy/framework/programme may be defined as gender-blind when the gender dimension is not considered, although there is clear scope for such consideration. This is often as a result of lack of training in, knowledge of and sensitization to gender issues, leading to an incomplete picture of the situation being addressed and, consequently, to failure.
Gender-neutral
6. An approach/strategy/framework/programme may be defined as gender-neutral when the human dimension is not relevant, and thus gender is not an implication.
Gender analysis
7. A tool to assist in strengthening development planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation, and to make programmes and projects more efficient and relevant. Ignoring gender issues has resulted in gender blind development strategies that have caused many development programmes and projects to fail in reaching their principal goals and delivering the desired benefits to the target population and have sometimes led to unintended negative impacts.
8. Within the United Nations system, gender analysis has been established as a basic requirement for the gender mainstreaming strategy. The current situation of rural women and men in relation to different issues and problems and the impact of agricultural and rural development policies, legislation, and projects and programmes on women and men respectively – and on the relations between them – should be analysed before any decisions are made.
9. Gender analysis should go beyond cataloguing differences to identifying inequalities and assessing relationships between women and men.
10. Gender analysis helps us to frame questions about women and men's roles and relations in order to avoid making assumptions about who does what, when and why. The aim of such analysis is to formulate development interventions that are better targeted to meet both women's and men's needs and constraints.
Gender equality
11. Gender equality entails the concept that all human beings, both men and women, are free to develop their personal abilities and make choices without the limitations set by stereotypes, rigid gender roles, or prejudices. Gender equality means that the different behaviours, aspirations and needs of women and men are considered, valued and favoured equally. It does not mean that women and men have to become the same, but that their rights, responsibilities and opportunities will not depend on whether they are born male or female.
Gender mainstreaming
12. In UNEP, gender mainstreaming involves ensuring that attention to gender equality is a central part of all environmental and sustainable development interventions, including analyses, policy advice, advocacy, legislation, research, and the planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of programmes and projects.
13. Gender mainstreaming has been defined by the ECOSOC Agreed Conclusions, in its resolution 1997/2 of 18 July 1997, as: “a strategy for mak ing women’s, as well as men’s, concerns and experiences an integral dimension in the design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of policies and programmes in all political, economic and social spheres so that women and men benefit equally and inequality is not perpetuated. The ultimate goal is to achieve gender equality.
Resources
14. Resources are means and goods, including those that are economic (household income) or productive (land, equipment, tools, work, credit); political (capability for leadership, information and organization); and time.
Previous:
Annex III. Terms of Reference Gender Focal Points UNEP
Feedback
Site Map
Contact us
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Credits
© CBD Secretariat
Rate this page