en
|
es
|
fr
English
|
Español
|
Français
Sign up for an account
|
Sign In
The Convention
About the Convention
History of the Convention
Convention Text
List of Parties
Decisions
Global Biodiversity Outlook (GBO 3)
Convention Protocols
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety
Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-Sharing
Convention Bodies
Conference of the Parties (COP)
Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA)
Working Group on the Review of Implementation (WGRI)
Intergovernmental Committee for the Nagoya Protocol (ICNP)
Working Group on Article 8(j)
Working Group on Protected Areas
Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020
Key Elements
Aichi Biodiversity Targets
Implementation
United Nations Decade on Biodiversity 2011-2020
Mechanisms for Implementation
National Biodiversity Strategies & Action Plans
National Reports
Financial Resources & Mechanism
LifeWeb for Financing Protected Areas
Clearing-House Mechanism (CHM)
Cooperation & Partnerships
South-South Cooperation
Consortium of Scientific Partners
Rio Conventions
Biodiversity-related Conventions
Japan Biodiversity Fund
Partnership Agreements
Cartagena Protocol
The Cartagena Protocol
What's new
About the Protocol
Text of the Cartagena Protocol
Strategic Plan
Key Protocol Issues
Assessment and Review
Capacity Building
Compliance
Financial Mechanism
Handling, Transport, Packaging and Identification
Information sharing
Liability and Redress
Monitoring and Reporting
Public Awareness and Participation
Risk Assessment
Risk Management
Roster of Experts
Socio-economic Considerations
Parties
List of Parties
Becoming a Party
National Contacts
National Reports
Status of Contributions
COP-MOP (Governing Body)
COP-MOP Bureau
COP-MOP Meetings
COP-MOP Decisions
Activities and Documentation
Meetings and Documents
Notifications
Reports of the Executive Secretary
Resources
The Biosafety Clearing-House
Frequently Asked Questions
Media and Outreach
A video on the Cartagena Protocol
Search the BIRC
Publications
Protocols and decisions
Fact Sheets and Banners
Newsletter
Biosafety Technical Series
Other Publications
Nagoya – Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress
The Biosafety Clearing-House (BCH)
Nagoya Protocol
Programmes
Thematic Programmes
Agricultural Biodiversity
Dry and Sub-humid Land Biodiversity
Forest Biodiversity
Inland Waters Biodiversity
Island Biodiversity
Marine and Coastal Biodiversity
Mountain Biodiversity
Major Groups
Local Authorities
Parliamentarians
Business
Universities and the Scientific Community
Children & Youth
The Green Wave for Schools
Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs)
Cross-Cutting Issues
Biodiversity for Development
Climate Change and Biodiversity
Communication, Education and Public Awareness
Economics, Trade and Incentive Measures
Ecosystem Approach
Gender and Biodiversity
Global Strategy for Plant Conservation
Global Taxonomy Initiative
Health & Biodiversity
Impact Assessment
Identification, Monitoring, Indicators and Assessments
Invasive Alien Species
Liability and Redress - Article 14.2
Protected Areas
Sustainable Use of Biodiversity
Technology Transfer and Cooperation
Tourism and Biodiversity
Traditional Knowledge, Innovations and Practices - Article 8(j)
New & Emerging Issues
Information
News and Communications
CBD Announcements
Statements
Notifications
News Headlines on Biodiversity
Press Releases
RSS Feeds
Twitter
Facebook
Discussion Forums
National Information
Country Profiles
List of Parties
Lists of National Focal Points
National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAPs)
National Reports
Status of Contributions
Multimedia
Photo Gallery
Video Gallery
YouTube
General References
Decisions
Recommendations
Meetings
Library and Documents
Principles, Guidelines and Tools
Resources for Negotiators
ECOLEX - A Gateway to Biodiversity-Related Law
Case Studies
Related Websites
Partnership Agreements
Thematic Databases
Ecosystem Approach Sourcebook
Database on Climate Change Adaptation
Database on Incentive Measures
Database of Scientific Assessments
Database on Technology Transfer
Case Studies on Impact Assessment
Case Studies on Dry and Sub-Humid Land Biodiversity
ABS Measures Search Page
ABS Database on Capacity Building Projects
ABS Roster of Experts
Secretariat
About the Secretariat
Staff
Museum of Nature and Culture
Initiatives
Secretariat Documents
Employment Opportunities
Information
News & Communications
Web Announcements
Statements
Notifications
News Headlines on Biodiversity
Press Releases
RSS Feeds
Twitter
Facebook
Discussion Forums
National Information
Country Profiles
List of Parties
Lists of National Focal Points
National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAPs)
National Reports
Status of Contributions
Multimedia
Video Gallery
YouTube
General References
Decisions
Recommendations
Meetings
Library and Documentation
Principles, Guidelines and Tools
Resources for Negotiators
ECOLEX - A Gateway to Biodiversity Law
Case Studies
Related Websites
Thematic Databases
Ecosystem Approach Sourcebook
Database on Climate Change Adaptation
Database on Incentive Measures
Database on Scientific Assessments
Database on Technology Transfer
Case Studies on Impact Assessment
Case Studies on Dry and Sub-Humid land Biodiversity
ABS Measures Search Page
ABS Database on Capacity Building Projects
ABS Roster of Experts
>
Information
>
SBSTTA Recommendation
Decisions
COP
COP-MOP
Recommendations
SBSTTA
WGRI
ICNP
ICCP
SBSTTA Recommendations
SBSTTA 16
SBSTTA 15
SBSTTA 14
SBSTTA 13
SBSTTA 12
SBSTTA 11
SBSTTA 10
SBSTTA 9
SBSTTA 8
SBSTTA 7
SBSTTA 6
SBSTTA 5
SBSTTA 4
SBSTTA 3
SBSTTA 2
SBSTTA 1
SBSTTA 14 Recommendations
XIV/1
XIV/2
XIV/3
XIV/4
XIV/5
XIV/6
XIV/7
XIV/8
XIV/9
XIV/10
XIV/11
XIV/12
XIV/13
XIV/14
XIV/15
XIV/16
XIV/17
SBSTTA 14 Recommendation XIV/14
XIV/14.
Global Taxonomy Initiative: results and lessons learned from regional taxonomic needs assessments and identification of priorities
The Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice recommends that Conference of the Parties adopt a decision along the following lines:
The Conference of the Parties,
1.
Recalls
that the ongoing taxonomic impediment not only threatens the generation of new taxonomic data, but also endangers the validation of taxonomic specimens and their associated data as deposited in natural history collections and other scientific resources;
2.
Recognizing
limited progress on taxonomic needs assessments at the national level,
urges
Parties and other Governments to conduct taxonomic needs assessments, where applicable, with particular regard to the full range of end-users and their need for taxonomic support in the implementation of all relevant articles and work programmes of the Convention;
3.
Acknowledging
the progress made at the global level with determining priority taxonomic needs for invasive alien species management,
encourages
Parties, other Governments and relevant organizations to determine priority taxonomic needs in the other thematic areas and cross-cutting issues of the Convention, taking into account the regionally specific needs in taxa and regionally determined capacity-building needs;
4.
Encourages
Parties and relevant organizations to make taxonomic and other necessary data and metadata from taxonomic and other relevant institutions and organizations and their collections available in response to the information needs identified as national and regional priorities such as,
inter alia
, information and expertise to manage invasive alien species and endangered species;
5.
Recognizing
the need for better and more comprehensive data of species distribution at bioregional scale,
urges
Parties and
invites
other Governments and organizations to better co-ordinate their taxonomic research in biogeographic regions, and to promote making new and existing information freely available;
6.
Further urges
Parties and
invites
other Governments and organizations to increase the knowledge base on ecological range and the condition of the species in order to better meet the user-needs in respect of bioindication of ecological health;
7.
Requests
the Executive Secretary with the assistance of the Global Taxonomy Initiative Coordination Mechanism and in collaboration with relevant international organizations, to hold capacity building training workshops in all subregions as needed;
8.
Urges
Parties and other Governments to endorse GTI-related project proposals relevant to their national biodiversity strategies and action plans prepared in collaboration with national, regional and global partner organizations and networks, to facilitate the process of project funding by the Global Environment Facility (GEF) and other relevant donors;
9.
Urges
Parties and
invites
other Governments to facilitate the development of the capacity, in collaboration with global, regional and subregional networks, as needed in:
(a)
The use of shareable taxonomic knowledge, and associated materials, by enhancing the management and use of in-country collections of referenced specimens, subject to the provision of
Article 15
of the Convention;
(b)
Molecular techniques commonly used in taxonomy, such as DNA barcoding; and
(c)
Training courses both for the users of taxonomic information and for young professional taxonomists;
10.
[
Recognizing
the importance of exchange of taxonomic voucher specimens for non-commercial biodiversity research
encourages
Parties, other Governments and organizations to find ways of facilitating and benefiting from regional and subregional scientific and technical collaborations in accordance with relevant national legislation [and subject to the outcomes of the negotiations on the international regime on access and benefit sharing under the Convention]];
11.
Recognizing
that the number of professional taxonomists is predicted to decrease and that the rapid accumulation of information in DNA sequences will require an expansion of taxonomic expertise to reliably identify the taxa from which the sequences derive; allowing to maximize the potential of new technologies for a wide range of biodiversity assessments,
encourages
Parties and other Governments to enhance the activities of institutions related to taxonomy to provide job opportunities for young taxonomists and to strengthen the taxonomic capacity to conduct appropriate training for parataxonomists and relevant end-users of taxonomy at national, regional and global levels;
12.
[Further recognizing
that taxonomic capacity is crucial for the implementation of all relevant articles and work programmes of the Convention and that the taxonomic capacity to inventory and monitor biodiversity, including the use of new technologies, such as DNA barcoding and other relevant information technology is not adequate in many parts of the world,
requests
the Global Environment Facility (GEF) and
invites
other donors to put higher priority for funding to GTI proposals];
13.
Welcoming
the progress on the establishment of a Special Trust Fund for the Global Taxonomy Initiative and
acknowledging with gratitude
the work of BioNET-INTERNATIONAL and relevant networks and organizations and Parties contributing to the development and promotion of the sponsorship strategy and global campaign,
invites
Parties and other Governments and organizations to respond urgently to make the trust fund operational;
14.
Welcomes
the section on taxonomy as part of the statement and recommendation from UNESCO International Year of Biodiversity Science Policy Conference, held at UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, from 25 to 29 January 2010 and
urges
Parties and
invites
other Governments and relevant organizations to support and implement, as appropriate, the following recommendations resulting from this Conference:
(a)
Supporting indigenous and local communities in capturing and preserving their taxonomic knowledge;
(b)
Applying cybertaxonomy, molecular and other innovative approaches to accelerate the taxonomic workflow of discovery and description;
(c)
Using digital and molecular infrastructure tools to integrate taxonomic data with other types of life science information, thus also broadening the products available to support identification and other services;
(d)
Prioritization of taxonomic efforts according to scientific knowledge gaps and user needs;
(e)
Making communication and outreach standard practice, and using Internet media platforms to reach the public and others;
(f)
Training a new generation of taxonomists, able to work flexibly and collaboratively and taking stock of new and emerging technologies and tools;
(g)
Appreciating the valuable contributions of taxonomy and recognizing it as a branch of cutting-edge science;
15.
Requests
the Executive Secretary in consultation with GTI Coordination Mechanism, national focal points for the Initiative and relevant institutions, bodies and organizations, to develop a comprehensive capacity building strategy for the Global Taxonomy Initiative at global and regional levels taking into account:
(a)
The taxonomic needs and capacities as already reported and especially considering outcome oriented deliverables;
(b)
Targets developed for the individual planned activities for the GTI programme of work;
(c)
The relevant stakeholders and resources required as well as possible funding mechanisms; and
(d)
Taxonomic needs and priorities for the thematic areas and other cross-cutting issues for the Convention, in particular for the work on protected areas and invasive alien species;
and present the draft progress report to the Conference of the Parties at its eleventh meeting, and requests the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice to review the draft strategy prior to the eleventh meeting of the Conference of the Parties;
16.
Requests
the Executive Secretary to develop a standard format for taxonomic needs and capacity assessments for use by Parties.
Feedback
Site Map
Contact us
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Credits
© CBD Secretariat
Rate this page