en
|
es
|
fr
English
|
Español
|
Français
Sign up for an account
|
Sign In
The Convention
About the Convention
History of the Convention
Convention Text
List of Parties
Decisions
Global Biodiversity Outlook (GBO 3)
Convention Protocols
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety
Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-Sharing
Convention Bodies
Conference of the Parties (COP)
Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA)
Working Group on the Review of Implementation (WGRI)
Intergovernmental Committee for the Nagoya Protocol (ICNP)
Working Group on Article 8(j)
Working Group on Protected Areas
Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020
Key Elements
Aichi Biodiversity Targets
Implementation
United Nations Decade on Biodiversity 2011-2020
Mechanisms for Implementation
National Biodiversity Strategies & Action Plans
National Reports
Financial Resources & Mechanism
LifeWeb for Financing Protected Areas
Clearing-House Mechanism (CHM)
Cooperation & Partnerships
South-South Cooperation
Consortium of Scientific Partners
Rio Conventions
Biodiversity-related Conventions
Japan Biodiversity Fund
Partnership Agreements
Cartagena Protocol
The Cartagena Protocol
What's new
About the Protocol
Text of the Cartagena Protocol
Strategic Plan
Key Protocol Issues
Assessment and Review
Capacity Building
Compliance
Financial Mechanism
Handling, Transport, Packaging and Identification
Information sharing
Liability and Redress
Monitoring and Reporting
Public Awareness and Participation
Risk Assessment
Risk Management
Roster of Experts
Socio-economic Considerations
Parties
List of Parties
Becoming a Party
National Contacts
National Reports
Status of Contributions
COP-MOP (Governing Body)
COP-MOP Bureau
COP-MOP Meetings
COP-MOP Decisions
Activities and Documentation
Meetings and Documents
Notifications
Reports of the Executive Secretary
Resources
The Biosafety Clearing-House
Frequently Asked Questions
Media and Outreach
A video on the Cartagena Protocol
Search the BIRC
Publications
Protocols and decisions
Fact Sheets and Banners
Newsletter
Biosafety Technical Series
Other Publications
Nagoya – Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress
The Biosafety Clearing-House (BCH)
Nagoya Protocol
Programmes
Thematic Programmes
Agricultural Biodiversity
Dry and Sub-humid Land Biodiversity
Forest Biodiversity
Inland Waters Biodiversity
Island Biodiversity
Marine and Coastal Biodiversity
Mountain Biodiversity
Major Groups
Local Authorities
Parliamentarians
Business
Universities and the Scientific Community
Children & Youth
The Green Wave for Schools
Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs)
Cross-Cutting Issues
Biodiversity for Development
Climate Change and Biodiversity
Communication, Education and Public Awareness
Economics, Trade and Incentive Measures
Ecosystem Approach
Gender and Biodiversity
Global Strategy for Plant Conservation
Global Taxonomy Initiative
Health & Biodiversity
Impact Assessment
Identification, Monitoring, Indicators and Assessments
Invasive Alien Species
Liability and Redress - Article 14.2
Protected Areas
Sustainable Use of Biodiversity
Technology Transfer and Cooperation
Tourism and Biodiversity
Traditional Knowledge, Innovations and Practices - Article 8(j)
New & Emerging Issues
Information
News and Communications
CBD Announcements
Statements
Notifications
News Headlines on Biodiversity
Press Releases
RSS Feeds
Twitter
Facebook
Discussion Forums
National Information
Country Profiles
List of Parties
Lists of National Focal Points
National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAPs)
National Reports
Status of Contributions
Multimedia
Photo Gallery
Video Gallery
YouTube
General References
Decisions
Recommendations
Meetings
Library and Documents
Principles, Guidelines and Tools
Resources for Negotiators
ECOLEX - A Gateway to Biodiversity-Related Law
Case Studies
Related Websites
Partnership Agreements
Thematic Databases
Ecosystem Approach Sourcebook
Database on Climate Change Adaptation
Database on Incentive Measures
Database of Scientific Assessments
Database on Technology Transfer
Case Studies on Impact Assessment
Case Studies on Dry and Sub-Humid Land Biodiversity
ABS Measures Search Page
ABS Database on Capacity Building Projects
ABS Roster of Experts
Secretariat
About the Secretariat
Staff
Museum of Nature and Culture
Initiatives
Secretariat Documents
Employment Opportunities
Information
News & Communications
Web Announcements
Statements
Notifications
News Headlines on Biodiversity
Press Releases
RSS Feeds
Twitter
Facebook
Discussion Forums
National Information
Country Profiles
List of Parties
Lists of National Focal Points
National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAPs)
National Reports
Status of Contributions
Multimedia
Video Gallery
YouTube
General References
Decisions
Recommendations
Meetings
Library and Documentation
Principles, Guidelines and Tools
Resources for Negotiators
ECOLEX - A Gateway to Biodiversity Law
Case Studies
Related Websites
Thematic Databases
Ecosystem Approach Sourcebook
Database on Climate Change Adaptation
Database on Incentive Measures
Database on Scientific Assessments
Database on Technology Transfer
Case Studies on Impact Assessment
Case Studies on Dry and Sub-Humid land Biodiversity
ABS Measures Search Page
ABS Database on Capacity Building Projects
ABS Roster of Experts
>
Information
>
WGRI Recommendation
Decisions
COP
COP-MOP
Recommendations
SBSTTA
WGRI
ICCP
WGRI Recommendations
WGRI 4
WGRI 3
WGRI 2
WGRI 1
WGRI 4 Recommendations
4/1
4/2
4/3
4/4
4/5
4/6
4/7
4/8
WGRI 4 Recommendation 4/3
4/3.
The financial mechanism: review of GEF-5 and needs for GEF-6
A.
Review of guidance to the financial mechanism
The Ad Hoc Open-ended Working Group on Review of Implementation of the Convention
,
Recalling
that the eleventh meeting of the Conference of the Parties will adopt a four-year outcome-oriented framework of programme priorities, taking into account the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020, including its Aichi Biodiversity Targets and associated indicators, in accordance with paragraph 7 of
decision X/24
,
Noting
the considerable allocation of resources made by the Global Environment Facility (GEF) to improve sustainability of protected areas and
encouraging
the continuation of this trend,
Welcoming
the increased orientation at the Global Environment Facility towards recipient country needs, ownership and synergies between conventions,
Commending
the efforts that the Global Environment Facility has made to simplify the process of access to funding,
1.
Requests
the Executive Secretary, in consultation with Parties and the Global Environment Facility, to develop a new four-year outcome-oriented framework of programme priorities for consideration at the eleventh meeting of the Conference of Parties, taking into account the following elements:
(a)
The Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020, including its Aichi Biodiversity Targets and associated indicators;
(b)
The draft report on the full assessment of the amount of funds that are necessary to assist developing countries and countries with economies in transition for the sixth replenishment period of the Global Environment Facility Trust Fund on the understanding that it is a preliminary draft report and will likely be adjusted;
(c)
Assessment of current GEF results, remaining programming gaps that need to be met and prioritization of key programming areas;
(d)
The need for strengthening capacity-building initiatives;
(e)
Further implementation of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety;
(f)
Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of the Benefits Arising from Their Utilization;
2.
Recommends
that the Conference of the Parties at its eleventh meeting adopt a decision along the following lines:
The Conference of the Parties
1.
Adopts
four-year outcome-oriented framework of programme priorities for the period 2014-2018 and requests the Global Environment Facility to implement it and report back to the Conference of the Parties at its thirteenth meeting;
2.
Encourages
the Global Environment Facility to further improve the timeliness of the provision of financial support;
3.
Invites
donors to increase their financial contributions through the financial mechanism during the GEF-6 replenishment period while recognizing the increase of funds made available under GEF-5, taking into account the substantial financial needs in order to implement the obligations of the Convention, the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 and the Aichi Biodiversity Targets.
B.
Assessment reports of the amount of funds needed for the Implementation of the Convention for the sixth replenishment period of the Global Environment Facility Trust Fund
The Ad Hoc Open-ended Working Group on Review of Implementation of the Convention
,
Noting
that the preliminary assessment report (
UNEP/CBD/WG-RI/4/INF/10
), once it is finalized, will be relevant in the overall discussion of resource mobilization,
Also noting
that the Global Environment Facility can only provide the incremental costs for global biodiversity benefits, and the assessment presented in the report provide inputs to the discussion on the overall funding needs,
1.
Reminds
Parties to provide the Secretariat with the data and information requested in the Executive Secretarys notifications regarding the GEF-6 funding needs assessment and the preliminary reporting framework in a timely manner;
2.
Takes note
of the preliminary report of the assessment of needs for GEF-6, prepared in accordance with
decision X/26
, and
expresses its appreciation
to the members of the expert group;
3.
Takes note
of the preliminary conclusions of the expert group as summarized in the annex to the note by the Executive Secretary (
UNEP/CBD/WG-RI/4/7
);
4.
Requests
the expert group, with the support of the Executive Secretary, to further develop the report (
UNEP/CBD/WG-RI/4/INF/10
), taking into account the following, for the consideration of the Conference of the Parties at its eleventh meeting:
(a)
The views expressed by Parties and observers at the fourth meeting of the Working Group on Review of Implementation of the Convention;
(b)
Additional views submitted by Parties, other Governments and organizations prior to 30 June 2012;
(c)
Work conducted by the high-level panel on financing for biodiversity, co-sponsored by India and the United Kingdom;
(d)
Other relevant technical information on the costs of implementing the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 and achieving the Aichi Biodiversity Targets;
5.
In response to paragraphs 6 in the annex to
decision X/26
,
requests
the Global Environment Facility and the Executive Secretary to conduct a review of the draft assessment report of the expert team to ensure accuracy and consistency of approach and data, and assessment of availability of funding through all sources;
6.
Recommends
that the Conference of the Parties adopt a decision along the following lines:
The Conference of the Parties
,
Recalling
decision X/26
,
1.
Emphasizes
that the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 and the Aichi Biodiversity Targets provides the overall framework for the implementation of the Convention for the decade, including for the activities during the period of the GEF-6 (2014-2018);
2.
Notes
that implementation of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 will require the funding of activities that contribute to all five goals and all twenty targets;
3.
Also notes
the report of the assessment of needs for GEF-6 and
expresses its appreciation
to the members of the expert group;
4.
Takes note
of the key messages of the assessment as summarized in the annex to the present note;
5.
Takes note
of the range of funding needs estimated for the sixth replenishment. This includes both what might be provided through the replenishment of the GEF trust fund for the biodiversity focal area, as well as what might be provided through other funds leveraged through the financial mechanism;
6.
Further notes
the need for a strengthened focus on mainstreaming and synergies, and
requests
the Executive Secretary and
invites
the GEF to identify the Aichi Targets benefiting the most from synergies with other GEF focal areas and make this information available for further use;
7.
Emphasizes
that:
(a)
The Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 and the Aichi Biodiversity Targets are an ambitious framework adopted by Parties to the Convention that require a substantial increase in the resources available;
(b)
Achievement of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets will require activities that address all five goals of the strategic plan;
(c)
Full use of the financial mechanism of the Convention, including GEF and its network of agencies, with improved efficiency of resource utilization and expanded financial support to recipient countries, is instrumental and critical in advancing the implementation of the Strategic Plan and the Aichi Biodiversity Targets;
(d)
International financial institutions and development organizations, national governments, and the private sector may need to play a greater role than hitherto in facilitating the mobilization of financial resources beyond the replenishment of the GEF Trust Fund itself;
(e)
Prioritization of activities needs to be done in consultation with the Convention through its Conference of Parties, based on the Four Year framework of programming priorities;
8.
Transmits
to the Global Environment Facility the report on the assessment of needs for GEF 6, for consideration by the Global Environment Facility, so that the Facility will in its regular report to the Conference of Parties indicate how it has responded during the replenishment cycle to the previous assessment by the Conference of the Parties.
C.
Fourth Review of the effectiveness of the financial mechanism
The Ad Hoc Open-ended Working Group on Review of Implementation of the Convention
,
Recalling
decision X/27
of the Conference of the Parties, and emphasizing the importance of regular reviews of the effectiveness of the financial mechanism,
Also recalling
that the Conference of the Parties has obligation to review the effectiveness of the financial mechanism under the Memorandum of Understanding between the Conference of the Parties and GEF,
Noting
that the fourth review is essential in the preparations for the eleventh meeting of the Conference of the Parties, and should be presented to the Parties well in advance of the meeting, in accordance with
decision X/27
,
Being aware
that because of the lack of financial resources, the fourth review of the effectiveness of the financial mechanism has not been done,
1.
Urges
the Executive secretary to effectively implement
decision X/27
and prepare the fourth review of the effectiveness of the financial mechanism in a timely and efficient manner;
2.
Requests
the Executive Secretary to examine the possibility of reallocating funds within existing resources to complete this review before the eleventh meeting of the Conference of the Parties and
encourages
donors that are in a position to do so to make urgent pledges to finance the implementation of
decision X/27
in time for the report to be presented at the eleventh meeting of the Conference of Parties.
Feedback
Site Map
Contact us
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Credits
© CBD Secretariat
Rate this page