ar
|
en
|
es
|
fr
العربية
|
English
|
Español
|
Français
Sign up for an account
|
Sign In
The Convention
About the Convention
History of the Convention
Convention Text
List of Parties
Decisions
Global Biodiversity Outlook (GBO 3)
Convention Protocols
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety
Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-Sharing
Convention Bodies
Conference of the Parties (COP)
Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA)
Working Group on the Review of Implementation (WGRI)
Intergovernmental Committee for the Nagoya Protocol (ICNP)
Working Group on Article 8(j)
Working Group on Protected Areas
Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020
Key Elements
Aichi Biodiversity Targets
Implementation
United Nations Decade on Biodiversity 2011-2020
Mechanisms for Implementation
National Biodiversity Strategies & Action Plans
National Reports
Financial Resources & Mechanism
LifeWeb for Financing Protected Areas
Clearing-House Mechanism (CHM)
Cooperation & Partnerships
South-South Cooperation
Consortium of Scientific Partners
Rio Conventions
Biodiversity-related Conventions
Japan Biodiversity Fund
Partnership Agreements
Cartagena Protocol
The Cartagena Protocol
What's new
About the Protocol
Text of the Cartagena Protocol
Strategic Plan
Key Protocol Issues
Assessment and Review
Capacity Building
Compliance
Financial Mechanism
Handling, Transport, Packaging and Identification
Information sharing
Liability and Redress
Monitoring and Reporting
Public Awareness and Participation
Risk Assessment
Risk Management
Roster of Experts
Socio-economic Considerations
Parties
List of Parties
Becoming a Party
National Contacts
National Reports
Status of Contributions
COP-MOP (Governing Body)
COP-MOP Bureau
COP-MOP Meetings
COP-MOP Decisions
Activities and Documentation
Meetings and Documents
Notifications
Reports of the Executive Secretary
Resources
The Biosafety Clearing-House
Frequently Asked Questions
Media and Outreach
A video on the Cartagena Protocol
Search the BIRC
Publications
Protocols and decisions
Fact Sheets and Banners
Newsletter
Biosafety Technical Series
Other Publications
Nagoya – Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress
The Biosafety Clearing-House (BCH)
Nagoya Protocol
Programmes
Thematic Programmes
Agricultural Biodiversity
Dry and Sub-humid Land Biodiversity
Forest Biodiversity
Inland Waters Biodiversity
Island Biodiversity
Marine and Coastal Biodiversity
Mountain Biodiversity
Major Groups
Local Authorities
Parliamentarians
Business
Universities and the Scientific Community
Children & Youth
The Green Wave for Schools
Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs)
Cross-Cutting Issues
Biodiversity for Development
Climate Change and Biodiversity
Communication, Education and Public Awareness
Economics, Trade and Incentive Measures
Ecosystem Approach
Gender and Biodiversity
Global Strategy for Plant Conservation
Global Taxonomy Initiative
Health & Biodiversity
Impact Assessment
Identification, Monitoring, Indicators and Assessments
Invasive Alien Species
Liability and Redress - Article 14.2
Protected Areas
Sustainable Use of Biodiversity
Technology Transfer and Cooperation
Tourism and Biodiversity
Traditional Knowledge, Innovations and Practices - Article 8(j)
New & Emerging Issues
Information
News and Communications
CBD Announcements
Statements
Notifications
News Headlines on Biodiversity
Press Releases
RSS Feeds
Twitter
Facebook
Discussion Forums
National Information
Country Profiles
List of Parties
Lists of National Focal Points
National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAPs)
National Reports
Status of Contributions
Multimedia
Photo Gallery
Video Gallery
YouTube
General References
Decisions
Recommendations
Meetings
Library and Documents
Principles, Guidelines and Tools
Resources for Negotiators
ECOLEX - A Gateway to Biodiversity-Related Law
Case Studies
Related Websites
Partnership Agreements
Thematic Databases
Ecosystem Approach Sourcebook
Database on Climate Change Adaptation
Database on Incentive Measures
Database of Scientific Assessments
Database on Technology Transfer
Case Studies on Impact Assessment
Case Studies on Dry and Sub-Humid Land Biodiversity
ABS Measures Search Page
ABS Database on Capacity Building Projects
ABS Roster of Experts
Secretariat
About the Secretariat
Staff
Museum of Nature and Culture
Initiatives
Secretariat Documents
Employment Opportunities
Information
News & Communications
Web Announcements
Statements
Notifications
News Headlines on Biodiversity
Press Releases
RSS Feeds
Twitter
Facebook
Discussion Forums
National Information
Country Profiles
List of Parties
Lists of National Focal Points
National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAPs)
National Reports
Status of Contributions
Multimedia
Video Gallery
YouTube
General References
Decisions
Recommendations
Meetings
Library and Documentation
Principles, Guidelines and Tools
Resources for Negotiators
ECOLEX - A Gateway to Biodiversity Law
Case Studies
Related Websites
Thematic Databases
Ecosystem Approach Sourcebook
Database on Climate Change Adaptation
Database on Incentive Measures
Database on Scientific Assessments
Database on Technology Transfer
Case Studies on Impact Assessment
Case Studies on Dry and Sub-Humid land Biodiversity
ABS Measures Search Page
ABS Database on Capacity Building Projects
ABS Roster of Experts
>
Information
>
COP Decision
Decisions
COP
COP-MOP
Recommendations
SBSTTA
WGRI
ICCP
COP Decisions
COP 10
COP 9
COP 8
COP 7
COP 6
COP 5
ExCOP 1
COP 4
COP 3
COP 2
COP 1
COP 10 Decisions
X/1
X/2
X/3
X/4
X/5
X/6
X/7
X/8
X/9
X/10
X/11
X/12
X/13
X/14
X/15
X/16
X/17
X/18
X/19
X/20
X/21
X/22
X/23
X/24
X/25
X/26
X/27
X/28
X/29
X/30
X/31
X/32
X/33
X/34
X/35
X/36
X/37
X/38
X/39
X/40
X/41
X/42
X/43
X/44
X/45
X/46
X/47
COP 10 Decision X/39
X/39.
Global Taxonomy Initiative
The Conference of the Parties,
Recalling
that the Global Taxonomy Initiative, with its programme of work adopted by the Conference of the Parties in
decision VI/8
and, reviewed in depth in
decision VIII/3
, with outcome oriented deliverables contained in
decision IX/22
, is the cross-cutting issue with priority in implementing all three objectives of the Convention in a balanced manner,
1.
Recalls
that the ongoing taxonomic impediment
99
not only threatens the generation of new taxonomic data, but also endangers the validation of taxonomic specimens and their associated data as deposited in natural history collections and other scientific resources;
2.
Recognizing
the limited progress on taxonomic needs assessments at the national level,
urges
Parties and other Governments to conduct taxonomic needs assessments, where applicable, with particular regard to the full range of end-users and their need for taxonomic support in the implementation of all relevant articles and work programmes of the Convention;
3.
Acknowledging
the progress made at the global level with determining priority taxonomic needs for invasive alien species management,
encourages
Parties, other Governments and relevant organizations to determine priority taxonomic needs in the other thematic areas and cross-cutting issues of the Convention, taking into account the regionally specific needs in taxa and regionally determined capacity-building needs;
4.
Encourages
Parties and relevant organizations to make taxonomic and other necessary data and metadata from taxonomic and other relevant institutions and organizations easily accessible and their collections available in response to the information needs identified as national and regional priorities such as,
inter alia
, information and expertise to manage invasive alien species and endangered species;
5.
Recognizing
the need for better and more comprehensive data of species distribution at bioregional scale,
urges
Parties and
invites
other Governments and organizations, to better coordinate their taxonomic research in biogeographic regions, and to share and exchange, new and existing information;
6.
Further urges
Parties and
invites
other Governments and organizations to increase the knowledge base on ecological range and the condition of the species in order to better meet the user-needs in respect of bioindication of ecological health;
7.
Requests
the Executive Secretary with the assistance of the Coordination Mechanism for the Global Taxonomy Initiative and in collaboration with relevant international organizations, to hold capacity-building training workshops in all subregions and regions as needed;
8.
Urges
Parties and
invites
other Governments to endorse Global Taxonomy Initiative-related project proposals relevant to their national biodiversity strategies and action plans prepared in collaboration with national, regional and global partner organizations and networks, to facilitate the process of project funding by the Global Environment Facility and through other relevant sources of funding;
9.
Urges
Parties and
invites
other Governments to facilitate the development of the capacity, in collaboration with global, regional and subregional networks, as needed in:
(a)
The use of shareable taxonomic knowledge, and associated materials, by enhancing the management and use of in-country collections of referenced specimens, subject to the provisions of Article 15 of the Convention;
(b)
Molecular techniques commonly used in taxonomy, such as DNA barcoding among others;
(c)
Training courses both for the users of taxonomic information and for young professional taxonomists;
(d)
Scientific collections in developing countries, particularly the least developed countries and small island developing states among them, and countries with economies in transition;
10.
Recognizing the importance of exchange of taxonomic voucher specimens for non-commercial biodiversity research,
encourages
Parties, other Governments and organizations to find ways of facilitating and benefiting from regional and subregional scientific and technical collaborations in accordance with relevant national legislation and relevant requirements where applicable with due regard for the need to address changes in use and intent other than taxonomic and subject to the outcomes of the negotiation on the international regime on access and benefit-sharing under the Convention;
11
Recognizing that the number of professional taxonomists is predicted to decrease and that the rapid accumulation of information in DNA sequences will require an expansion of taxonomic expertise to reliably identify the taxa from which the sequences derive; allowing potential of new technologies to be maximize for a wide range of biodiversity assessments,
encourages
Parties and other Governments to enhance the activities of institutions related to taxonomy to provide job opportunities and incentives for young taxonomists and to strengthen the taxonomic capacity to conduct appropriate training for parataxonomists and relevant end-users of taxonomy at national, regional and global levels;
12.
Invites
Parties, other Governments and international and funding organizations to carry out implementation of the programme of work for the Global Taxonomy Initiative with special attention to national and regional inventories of all organisms, i.e. plants, animals and microorganisms;
13.
Further recognizing that taxonomic capacity is crucial for the implementation of all relevant articles and work programmes of the Convention and that the taxonomic capacity to inventory and monitor biodiversity, including the use of new technologies, such as DNA barcoding and other relevant information technology is not adequate in many parts of the world,
invites
the Global Environment Facility, Parties, other Governments, and other international and funding organizations to put higher priority for funding to GTI proposals;
14.
Welcoming the progress on the establishment of a Special Trust Fund for the Global Taxonomy Initiative and
acknowledging
the work of BioNET-INTERNATIONAL and relevant networks and organizations and Parties contributing to the development and promotion of the sponsorship strategy and global campaign, as elaborated in the progress report on the establishment of a special fund for the Global Taxonomy Initiative:
100
(a)
Invites
Parties and other Governments and organizations to respond urgently to make the trust fund operational before the eleventh meeting of the Conference of the Parties;
(b)
Requests
the Executive Secretary, in accordance with
decision IX/22
to propose the formal constitution of a steering committee reflecting regional balance and other appropriate expertise to facilitate identification of suitable funding sources and assist the operationalization of the Special Fund taking into account the suggestions included in the progress report;
15.
Welcomes
the section on taxonomy as part of the statement and recommendation from UNESCO International Year of Biodiversity Science Policy Conference, held at UNESCO Headquarters, Paris from 25 to 29 January 2010 and
urges
Parties and
invites
other Governments and relevant organizations to support and implement, as appropriate, in accordance with all three objectives of the Convention on Biological Diversity and, where applicable, with prior informed consent and/or approval and involvement of indigenous and local communities, as well as relevant national legislation, the following recommendations for scaling up and sustaining taxonomy resulting from this Conference:
(a)
Supporting indigenous and local communities in capturing and preserving their taxonomic knowledge;
(b)
Applying cybertaxonomy, molecular and other innovative approaches to accelerate the taxonomic workflow of discovery and description;
(c)
Using digital and molecular infrastructure tools to integrate taxonomic data with other types of life science information, thus also broadening the products available to support identification and other services;
(d)
Prioritization of taxonomic efforts according to scientific knowledge gaps and user needs;
(e)
Making communication and outreach standard practice, and using Internet media platforms to reach the public and others;
(f)
Training a new generation of taxonomists, able to work flexibly and collaboratively and taking stock of new and emerging technologies and tools;
(g)
Appreciating the valuable contributions of taxonomy and recognizing it as a branch of cutting-edge science;
16.
Requests
the Executive Secretary in consultation with Coordination Mechanism for the Global Taxonomy Initiative, national focal points for the Initiative and relevant institutions, bodies and organizations, to develop a comprehensive capacity-building strategy for the Global Taxonomy Initiative at global and regional levels that addresses the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020, taking into account:
(a)
The need for consistency between the planned activities relevant to capacity-building in programme of work for the Global Taxonomy Initiative and the outcome oriented deliverables contained in
decision IX/22
;
(b)
Taxonomic needs and capacities as already reported;
(c)
The relevant stakeholders and resources required as well as possible funding mechanisms; and
(d)
Taxonomic needs and priorities for the thematic areas and other cross-cutting issues for the Convention, in particular for the work on protected areas and invasive alien species; and
present
the draft progress report to the Conference of the Parties at its eleventh meeting, and
requests
the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice to review the draft strategy prior to the eleventh meeting of the Conference of the Parties;
17.
Requests
the Executive Secretary to develop a standard format for taxonomic needs and capacity assessments for use by Parties;
18.
Requests
the Executive Secretary in consultation with the Coordination Mechanism for Global Taxonomy Initiative and the ad hoc technical expert group on post-2010 indicators to consider developing an indicator in order to assess the progress on the implementation of the programme of work for the Initiative as needed.
99
The problems of insufficient knowledge of all components of biological diversity, including their classification, description, value and functions and lack of taxonomic capacity as contained in
decision VI/8
.
100
UNEP/CBD/CO/10/INF/35
.
Feedback
Site Map
Contact us
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Credits
© CBD Secretariat
Rate this page