en
|
es
|
fr
English
|
Español
|
Français
Sign up for an account
|
Sign In
The Convention
About the Convention
History of the Convention
Convention Text
List of Parties
Decisions
Global Biodiversity Outlook (GBO 3)
Convention Protocols
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety
Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-Sharing
Convention Bodies
Conference of the Parties (COP)
Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA)
Working Group on the Review of Implementation (WGRI)
Intergovernmental Committee for the Nagoya Protocol (ICNP)
Working Group on Article 8(j)
Working Group on Protected Areas
Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020
Key Elements
Aichi Biodiversity Targets
Implementation
United Nations Decade on Biodiversity 2011-2020
Mechanisms for Implementation
National Biodiversity Strategies & Action Plans
National Reports
Financial Resources & Mechanism
LifeWeb for Financing Protected Areas
Clearing-House Mechanism (CHM)
Cooperation & Partnerships
South-South Cooperation
Consortium of Scientific Partners
Rio Conventions
Biodiversity-related Conventions
Japan Biodiversity Fund
Partnership Agreements
Cartagena Protocol
The Cartagena Protocol
What's new
About the Protocol
Text of the Cartagena Protocol
Strategic Plan
Key Protocol Issues
Assessment and Review
Capacity Building
Compliance
Detection and Identification
Financial Mechanism
Handling, Transport, Packaging and Identification
Information sharing
Liability and Redress
Monitoring and Reporting
Public Awareness and Participation
Risk Assessment
Risk Management
Roster of Experts
Socio-economic Considerations
Parties
List of Parties
Becoming a Party
National Contacts
National Reports
Status of Contributions
COP-MOP (Governing Body)
COP-MOP Bureau
COP-MOP Meetings
COP-MOP Decisions
Activities and Documentation
Meetings and Documents
Notifications
Reports of the Executive Secretary
Resources
The Biosafety Clearing-House
Frequently Asked Questions
Media and Outreach
A video on the Cartagena Protocol
Search the BIRC
Publications
Protocols and decisions
Fact Sheets and Banners
Newsletter
Biosafety Technical Series
Other Publications
Nagoya – Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress
The Biosafety Clearing-House (BCH)
Nagoya Protocol
Programmes
Thematic Programmes
Agricultural Biodiversity
Dry and Sub-humid Land Biodiversity
Forest Biodiversity
Inland Waters Biodiversity
Island Biodiversity
Marine and Coastal Biodiversity
Mountain Biodiversity
Major Groups
Local Authorities
Parliamentarians
Business
Universities and the Scientific Community
Children & Youth
The Green Wave for Schools
Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs)
Cross-Cutting Issues
Biodiversity for Development
Climate Change and Biodiversity
Communication, Education and Public Awareness
Economics, Trade and Incentive Measures
Ecosystem Approach
Gender and Biodiversity
Global Strategy for Plant Conservation
Global Taxonomy Initiative
Health & Biodiversity
Impact Assessment
Identification, Monitoring, Indicators and Assessments
Invasive Alien Species
Liability and Redress - Article 14.2
Protected Areas
Sustainable Use of Biodiversity
Technology Transfer and Cooperation
Tourism and Biodiversity
Traditional Knowledge, Innovations and Practices - Article 8(j)
New & Emerging Issues
Information
News and Communications
CBD Announcements
Statements
Notifications
News Headlines on Biodiversity
Press Releases
RSS Feeds
Twitter
Facebook
Discussion Forums
National Information
Country Profiles
List of Parties
Lists of National Focal Points
National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAPs)
National Reports
Status of Contributions
Multimedia
Photo Gallery
Video Gallery
YouTube
General References
Decisions
Recommendations
Meetings
Library and Documents
Principles, Guidelines and Tools
Resources for Negotiators
ECOLEX - A Gateway to Biodiversity-Related Law
Case Studies
Related Websites
Partnership Agreements
Thematic Databases
Ecosystem Approach Sourcebook
Database on Climate Change Adaptation
Database on Incentive Measures
Database of Scientific Assessments
Database on Technology Transfer
Case Studies on Impact Assessment
Case Studies on Dry and Sub-Humid Land Biodiversity
ABS Measures Search Page
ABS Database on Capacity Building Projects
ABS Roster of Experts
Secretariat
About the Secretariat
Staff
Museum of Nature and Culture
Initiatives
Secretariat Documents
Employment Opportunities
Doing Business with the CBD
Information
News & Communications
Web Announcements
Statements
Notifications
News Headlines on Biodiversity
Press Releases
RSS Feeds
Twitter
Facebook
Discussion Forums
National Information
Country Profiles
List of Parties
Lists of National Focal Points
National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAPs)
National Reports
Status of Contributions
Multimedia
Video Gallery
YouTube
General References
Decisions
Recommendations
Meetings
Library and Documentation
Principles, Guidelines and Tools
Resources for Negotiators
ECOLEX - A Gateway to Biodiversity Law
Case Studies
Related Websites
Thematic Databases
Ecosystem Approach Sourcebook
Database on Climate Change Adaptation
Database on Incentive Measures
Database on Scientific Assessments
Database on Technology Transfer
Case Studies on Impact Assessment
Case Studies on Dry and Sub-Humid land Biodiversity
ABS Measures Search Page
ABS Database on Capacity Building Projects
ABS Roster of Experts
>
Information
>
COP-MOP Decision
Decisions
COP
COP-MOP
Recommendations
SBSTTA
WGRI
ICCP
COP-MOP Decisions
MOP 5
MOP 4
MOP 3
MOP 2
MOP 1
COP-MOP 5 Decisions
BS-V/1
BS-V/2
BS-V/3
BS-V/4
BS-V/5
BS-V/6
BS-V/7
BS-V/8
BS-V/9
BS-V/10
BS-V/11
BS-V/12
BS-V/13
BS-V/14
BS-V/15
BS-V/16
BS-V/17
MOP 5 Decision BS-V/12
BS-V/12.
Risk assessment and risk management (Articles 15 and 16)
The Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety,
Recalling
its
decision BS-IV/11
on risk assessment and risk management,
I.
Further guidance on specific aspects of risk assessment
1.
Commends
the use of innovative methods under the open-ended online forum on risk assessment and risk management as an efficient means to maximize the use of limited financial resources;
2.
Takes note
of the conclusions and recommendations of the open-ended online forum and the Ad Hoc Technical Expert Group on Risk Assessment and Risk Management and
welcomes
the resulting Guidance on Risk Assessment of Living Modified Organisms (hereinafter referred to as the Guidance);
3.
Notes
that the Guidance is a document in evolution and that its objective is to provide a reference that may assist Parties and other Governments in implementing the provisions of the Protocol with regards to risk assessment, in particular its Annex III and, as such, this Guidance is not prescriptive and does not impose any obligations upon the Parties;
4.
Decides
to extend the current open-ended online forum and the Ad Hoc Technical Expert Group on Risk Assessment and Risk Management in accordance with the terms of reference annexed hereto;
5.
Urges
Parties and
invites
other Governments and relevant organizations to nominate further experts with experience relevant to risk assessment to the open-ended online forum and to actively participate in the online discussions;
6.
Further notes
that the first version of the Guidance requires further scientific reviewing and testing to establish its overall utility and applicability to living modified organisms of different taxa introduced into different environments, and
requests
the Executive Secretary to, prior to the first meeting of the Ad Hoc Technical Expert Group on Risk Assessment and Risk Management, (i) translate the first version of the Guidance into all United Nations languages with a view to enabling a large number of experts to take part in the reviewing process; (ii) coordinate with Parties and other Governments, through their technical and scientific experts, and relevant organizations, a review process of the first version of the Guidance; (iii) make the comments of the review process available through the Biosafety-Clearing House;
7.
Requests
the Executive Secretary to convene, prior to the sixth meeting of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Protocol, (i)
ad hoc
discussion groups and real-time online conferences under the open-ended online forum, and (ii) two meetings of the Ad Hoc Technical Expert Group, and to compile the views and recommendations submitted by participants in the online forum for consideration by the Parties;
8.
Further requests
the Executive Secretary to: (i) update the common format for submission of records to the Biosafety Information Resources Centre in order to link its records on risk assessment to specific sections of the Guidance; and (ii) explore possible ways to link background materials available in the Scientific Bibliographic Database on Biosafety to specific sections of the Guidance;
II.
Capacity-building in risk assessment
Welcoming
the development of a training manual on risk assessment of living modified organisms,
Welcoming also
the reports of the Pacific Subregional Workshop on Capacity-building and Exchange of Experiences on Risk Assessment (
UNEP/CBD/BS/COP-MOP/5/INF/16
) held in Nadi, Fiji and of the Asian Subregional Training Course on Risk Assessment of Living Modified Organisms (
UNEP/CBD/BS/COP-MOP/5/INF/17
) held in Siem Reap, Cambodia and
taking note
of their recommendations,
9.
Requests
the Executive Secretary to:
(a)
Submit the training manual to experts and other reviewers from Parties and other Governments for an assessment of its effectiveness;
(b)
Convene, at the earliest convenient date, further regional or subregional training courses to enable countries to gain hands-on experience in the preparation and evaluation of risk assessment reports in accordance with the relevant articles and Annex III of the Protocol, and to further test the first version of the Guidance and make the results of the testing available through the Biosafety-Clearing House;
(c)
Improve the training manual Risk Assessment of Living Modified Organisms in cooperation with relevant United Nations bodies, other relevant organizations and expert reviewers by revising it on the basis of the recommendations provided during the regional and subregional capacity-building activities and feedback from Parties, in such a way that any further improvements of the training manual, on the one hand, and of the Guidance through the process outlined in paragraph 6 above, on the other hand, is made in a coherent and complementary manner;
(d)
Develop an interactive learning tool based on the training manual, and make it available through the Biosafety Clearing-House in all United Nations languages with the view to developing a more cost-effective way for delivering training on risk assessment;
III.
Identifying living modified organisms or specific traits that
may have
adverse effects on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, taking also into account risks to human health
Welcoming
the views submitted by Parties, other Government and relevant organizations regarding the identification of living modified organisms or specific traits that may have adverse effects on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, taking also into account risks to human health and
acknowledging
the challenges in harmonizing the divergent views,
Welcoming also
the recommendations by the Ad Hoc Technical Expert Group on Risk Assessment and Risk Management regarding possible modalities for cooperation in identifying living modified organisms or specific traits that may have adverse effects on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, taking also into account risks to human health, in particular the implementation of a step-wise approach for this purpose that starts with the exchange of information,
10.
Urges
Parties and
invites
other Governments to submit to the Biosafety Clearing-House decisions and risk assessments where potential adverse effects have been identified, as well as any other relevant information that may assist Parties in the identification of living modified organisms or specific traits that may have adverse effects on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, taking also into account risks to human health, including information, if possible, when a decision is not taken due to the potential of a living modified organism to cause adverse effects when introduced into specific environments;
11.
Requests
the Executive Secretary to compile the information for consideration by the Parties at their sixth meeting;
IV.
Identifying living modified organisms that
are not likely
to have adverse effects on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, taking also into account risks to human health
Recalling
the provisions of the medium-term programme of work,
decision BS-I/12
paragraph 7 (a) (i), to consider a modality that might enable the identification of living modified organisms that are not likely to have adverse effects on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, taking also into account risks to human health, with a view to arriving at a decision in accordance with paragraph 4 of Article 7,
12.
Requests
Parties and
invites
other Governments and relevant organizations to submit to the Executive Secretary (i) information on risk assessments, carried out on a case-by-case basis with regards to the receiving environment of the living modified organism, that might assist Parties in the identification of living modified organisms that are not likely to have adverse effects on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, taking also into account risks to human health, and (ii) the criteria that were considered for the identification of such living modified organisms;
13.
Requests
the Executive Secretary to compile the information received and prepare a synthesis report for consideration by the Parties at their sixth meeting.
Annex
TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE OPEN-ENDED ONLINE FORUM AND AD HOC TECHNICAL EXPERT GROUP ON RISK ASSESSMENT AND RISK MANAGEMENT
Methodology
1.
The open-ended online forum and the Ad Hoc Technical Expert Group on Risk Assessment and Risk Management shall work primarily online to (i) revise and test the first version of the Guidance on the basis of the results of the scientific review process, the testing associated with capacity-building activities and any testing initiated by the Ad Hoc Technical Expert Group and organized by the Executive Secretary, and (ii) assess the overall applicability and utility of the Guidance to living modified organisms across different taxa and receiving environments, with the view to achieving the expected outcomes outlined below;
2.
The Ad Hoc Technical Expert Group on Risk Assessment and Risk Management shall meet twice face-to-face prior to the sixth meeting of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Protocol;
Expected outcomes
3.
The open-ended online forum and the Ad Hoc Technical Expert Group on Risk Assessment and Risk Management shall work together with the view to developing and achieving the following:
(a)
A revised version of the Guidance on Risk Assessment of Living Modified Organisms;
(b)
A mechanism, including criteria, for future updates of the lists of background materials;
(c)
Further guidance on new specific topics of risk assessment, selected on the basis of the priorities and needs by the Parties and taking into account the topics identified in the previous intersessional period;
Reporting
4.
The open-ended online forum and the Ad Hoc Technical Expert Group on Risk Assessment and Risk Management shall submit final reports detailing their activities, outcomes and recommendations for consideration by the sixth meeting of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Protocol.
Feedback
Site Map
Contact us
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Credits
© CBD Secretariat
Rate this page