ar
|
en
|
es
|
fr
العربية
|
English
|
Español
|
Français
Sign up for an account
|
Sign In
The Convention
About the Convention
History of the Convention
Convention Text
List of Parties
Decisions
Global Biodiversity Outlook (GBO 3)
Convention Protocols
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety
Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-Sharing
Convention Bodies
Conference of the Parties (COP)
Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA)
Working Group on the Review of Implementation (WGRI)
Intergovernmental Committee for the Nagoya Protocol (ICNP)
Working Group on Article 8(j)
Working Group on Protected Areas
Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020
Key Elements
Aichi Biodiversity Targets
Implementation
United Nations Decade on Biodiversity 2011-2020
Mechanisms for Implementation
National Biodiversity Strategies & Action Plans
National Reports
Financial Resources & Mechanism
LifeWeb for Financing Protected Areas
Clearing-House Mechanism (CHM)
Cooperation & Partnerships
South-South Cooperation
Consortium of Scientific Partners
Rio Conventions
Biodiversity-related Conventions
Japan Biodiversity Fund
Partnership Agreements
Cartagena Protocol
The Cartagena Protocol
What's new
About the Protocol
Text of the Cartagena Protocol
Strategic Plan
Key Protocol Issues
Assessment and Review
Capacity Building
Compliance
Financial Mechanism
Handling, Transport, Packaging and Identification
Information sharing
Liability and Redress
Monitoring and Reporting
Public Awareness and Participation
Risk Assessment
Risk Management
Roster of Experts
Socio-economic Considerations
Parties
List of Parties
Becoming a Party
National Contacts
National Reports
Status of Contributions
COP-MOP (Governing Body)
COP-MOP Bureau
COP-MOP Meetings
COP-MOP Decisions
Activities and Documentation
Meetings and Documents
Notifications
Reports of the Executive Secretary
Resources
The Biosafety Clearing-House
Frequently Asked Questions
Media and Outreach
A video on the Cartagena Protocol
Search the BIRC
Publications
Protocols and decisions
Fact Sheets and Banners
Newsletter
Biosafety Technical Series
Other Publications
Nagoya – Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress
The Biosafety Clearing-House (BCH)
Nagoya Protocol
Programmes
Thematic Programmes
Agricultural Biodiversity
Dry and Sub-humid Land Biodiversity
Forest Biodiversity
Inland Waters Biodiversity
Island Biodiversity
Marine and Coastal Biodiversity
Mountain Biodiversity
Major Groups
Local Authorities
Parliamentarians
Business
Universities and the Scientific Community
Children & Youth
The Green Wave for Schools
Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs)
Cross-Cutting Issues
Biodiversity for Development
Climate Change and Biodiversity
Communication, Education and Public Awareness
Economics, Trade and Incentive Measures
Ecosystem Approach
Gender and Biodiversity
Global Strategy for Plant Conservation
Global Taxonomy Initiative
Health & Biodiversity
Impact Assessment
Identification, Monitoring, Indicators and Assessments
Invasive Alien Species
Liability and Redress - Article 14.2
Protected Areas
Sustainable Use of Biodiversity
Technology Transfer and Cooperation
Tourism and Biodiversity
Traditional Knowledge, Innovations and Practices - Article 8(j)
New & Emerging Issues
Information
News and Communications
CBD Announcements
Statements
Notifications
News Headlines on Biodiversity
Press Releases
RSS Feeds
Twitter
Facebook
Discussion Forums
National Information
Country Profiles
List of Parties
Lists of National Focal Points
National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAPs)
National Reports
Status of Contributions
Multimedia
Photo Gallery
Video Gallery
YouTube
General References
Decisions
Recommendations
Meetings
Library and Documents
Principles, Guidelines and Tools
Resources for Negotiators
ECOLEX - A Gateway to Biodiversity-Related Law
Case Studies
Related Websites
Partnership Agreements
Thematic Databases
Ecosystem Approach Sourcebook
Database on Climate Change Adaptation
Database on Incentive Measures
Database of Scientific Assessments
Database on Technology Transfer
Case Studies on Impact Assessment
Case Studies on Dry and Sub-Humid Land Biodiversity
ABS Measures Search Page
ABS Database on Capacity Building Projects
ABS Roster of Experts
Secretariat
About the Secretariat
Staff
Museum of Nature and Culture
Initiatives
Secretariat Documents
Employment Opportunities
Biodiversity for Development
About
What does it mean?
Why is it important?
Main challenges
What needs to be done?
Initiative
Background
COP Decisions
Objectives and workplan
Implementation
Partnerships
Information Material
Case studies
Tool Box
Related Information
Notifications
Meetings
Related Documents
Related Web Sites
>
Programmes & Issues
>
Biodiversity for Development
>
About
>
Why is it important?
Why is biodiversity important for development?
Source of food and income
The world’s poor, particularly in rural areas, depend on biological resources for as much as 90% of their needs, including food, fuel, medicine, shelter and transportation.
70% of the world’s poor live in rural areas and depend directly on biological diversity for their livelihoods. Biodiversity serves as an important source of food and income to rural households and is an important source of alternative foods during periods of scarcity.
The impact of environmental degradation is most severe among the rural population living in poverty, since they have few livelihood options. Therefore, access to and sustainable use of biodiversity by the poor are of direct relevance to efforts aimed at poverty reduction. Addressing the biodiversity challenge needs to be at the heart of international cooperation for sustainable development and poverty reduction.
Ecosystems, Goods and Services: a crucial role
In order to link biodiversity considerations with poverty eradication, the environmental community and the stakeholders who specifically deal with the economic and social dimensions of development need a common framework, a common language. The concept of “Ecosystem Goods and Services” (EGS) satisfies this need. For both the environmental and development communities, EGS are, simply and unanimously “the benefits people obtain from ecosystems."
These include provisioning services such as food and water; regulating services such as flood and disease control; cultural services such as spiritual, recreational, and cultural benefits; and supporting services such as nutrient cycling that maintain the conditions for life on Earth.
EGS such as watershed protection, pest control, nutrient cycling and pollination sustain productivity in agricultural ecosystems. When impaired or degraded, extreme poverty and hunger are more difficult to address and to overcome. In the long term, the loss of biodiversity that results in a reduction of crop and livestock genetic diversity and in the decreased availability of wild biological resources, threatens food security for the whole population.
Most EGS are defined as “public goods” in plain economic terms. As such they are difficult to incorporate into markets, but it is widely believed that it is now time to overcome this through substantial and effective environmental mainstreaming processes.
Sustaining the economy and generating income
At the ecosystem level, biodiversity provides the conditions and drives the processes that sustain the global economy – and our very survival. Disrupting the diversity of plant and animal life can have dire repercussions for the world economy.
If there is growing awareness on the value and importance of biodiversity, there is a lack of consensus on how it can be measured. Biodiversity offers the potential to place unique products on the market and to generate income for local communities. Many of these products are very valuable yet their sale seldom benefits the people who harvest them.
Find out more under the
Trade and Incentive Measures WebPages
The
Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) initiative
, often compared to the Stern Report on the cost of climate change, draws attention to the local and global benefits of biodiversity and to the social and economic costs of biodiversity loss and ecosystem degradation. The study will provide a worldwide evaluation of the costs of biodiversity loss and of the associated decline in ecosystem services. These costs will be compared with the costs of effective conservation and sustainable use. Led by UNEP, TEEB is funded by several governments.
TEEB’s first report
presents the results of an analysis on the costs of biodiversity loss in forest ecosystems and of ecosystem services stemming from forests.
Feedback
Site Map
Contact us
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Credits
© CBD Secretariat
Rate this page