ar
|
en
|
es
|
fr
|
ru
العربية
|
English
|
Español
|
Français
|
Русский
Sign up for an account
|
Sign In
The Convention
About the Convention
History of the Convention
Convention Text
List of Parties
Decisions
Global Biodiversity Outlook (GBO 3)
Convention Protocols
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety
Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-Sharing
Convention Bodies
Conference of the Parties (COP)
Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA)
Working Group on the Review of Implementation (WGRI)
Intergovernmental Committee for the Nagoya Protocol (ICNP)
Working Group on Article 8(j)
Working Group on Protected Areas
Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020
Key Elements
Aichi Biodiversity Targets
Implementation
United Nations Decade on Biodiversity 2011-2020
Mechanisms for Implementation
National Biodiversity Strategies & Action Plans
National Reports
Financial Resources & Mechanism
LifeWeb for Financing Protected Areas
Clearing-House Mechanism (CHM)
Cooperation & Partnerships
South-South Cooperation
Consortium of Scientific Partners
Rio Conventions
Biodiversity-related Conventions
Japan Biodiversity Fund
Partnership Agreements
Cartagena Protocol
The Cartagena Protocol
What's new
About the Protocol
Text of the Cartagena Protocol
Strategic Plan
Key Protocol Issues
Assessment and Review
Capacity Building
Compliance
Detection and Identification
Financial Mechanism
Handling, Transport, Packaging and Identification
Information sharing
Liability and Redress
Monitoring and Reporting
Public Awareness and Participation
Risk Assessment
Risk Management
Roster of Experts
Socio-economic Considerations
Parties
List of Parties
Becoming a Party
National Contacts
National Reports
Status of Contributions
COP-MOP (Governing Body)
COP-MOP Bureau
COP-MOP Meetings
COP-MOP Decisions
Activities and Documentation
Meetings and Documents
Notifications
Reports of the Executive Secretary
Resources
The Biosafety Clearing-House
Frequently Asked Questions
Media and Outreach
A video on the Cartagena Protocol
Search the BIRC
Publications
Protocols and decisions
Fact Sheets and Banners
Newsletter
Biosafety Technical Series
Other Publications
Nagoya – Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress
The Biosafety Clearing-House (BCH)
Nagoya Protocol
Programmes
Thematic Programmes
Agricultural Biodiversity
Dry and Sub-humid Land Biodiversity
Forest Biodiversity
Inland Waters Biodiversity
Island Biodiversity
Marine and Coastal Biodiversity
Mountain Biodiversity
Major Groups
Local Authorities
Parliamentarians
Business
Universities and the Scientific Community
Children & Youth
The Green Wave for Schools
Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs)
Cross-Cutting Issues
Biodiversity for Development
Climate Change and Biodiversity
Communication, Education and Public Awareness
Economics, Trade and Incentive Measures
Ecosystem Approach
Gender and Biodiversity
Global Strategy for Plant Conservation
Global Taxonomy Initiative
Impact Assessment
Health & Biodiversity
Identification, Monitoring, Indicators and Assessments
Invasive Alien Species
Liability and Redress - Article 14.2
Protected Areas
Sustainable Use of Biodiversity
Technology Transfer and Cooperation
Tourism and Biodiversity
Traditional Knowledge, Innovations and Practices - Article 8(j)
New & Emerging Issues
Information
News and Communications
CBD Announcements
Statements
Notifications
News Headlines on Biodiversity
Press Releases
RSS Feeds
Twitter
Facebook
Discussion Forums
National Information
Country Profiles
List of Parties
Lists of National Focal Points
National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAPs)
National Reports
Status of Contributions
Multimedia
Photo Gallery
Video Gallery
YouTube
General References
Decisions
Recommendations
Meetings
Library and Documents
Principles, Guidelines and Tools
Resources for Negotiators
ECOLEX - A Gateway to Biodiversity-Related Law
Case Studies
Related Websites
Partnership Agreements
Thematic Databases
Ecosystem Approach Sourcebook
Database on Climate Change Adaptation
Database on Incentive Measures
Database of Scientific Assessments
Database on Technology Transfer
Case Studies on Impact Assessment
Case Studies on Dry and Sub-Humid Land Biodiversity
ABS Measures Search Page
ABS Database on Capacity Building Projects
ABS Roster of Experts
Secretariat
About the Secretariat
Staff
Museum of Nature and Culture
Initiatives
Secretariat Documents
Employment Opportunities
Doing Business with the CBD
National Reports
About National Reporting
Introduction
Reports
Background
Search National Reports and NBSAPs
Fifth National Report
Fourth National Report
Thematic Reports
Syntheses and Reporting Mechanism
Harmonization of reporting
Guidance and Tools
Decisions
Guidelines
Financial Support to Parties
Analyze national reports
Related Information
Notifications
Strategic Plan 2011-2020, including Aichi Targets
National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAPs)
Country Profiles
Subnational Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (SBSAPs)
>
Mechanisms
>
National Reports
>
Reports
>
National
Background
Click
here
to search all national reports and NBSAPs.
First National Reports
At its second meeting (Jakarta, November 1995), the Conference of the Parties decided that the first national reports should 'focus in so far as possible on the measures taken for the implementation of
Article 6
of the Convention, as well as the information available in national country studies on biological diversity' (
decision II/17
). At its third meeting (Buenos Aires, November 1996), the Conference of the Parties decided that the first national reports should be submitted no later than
1 January 1998
(
decision III/9
).
At its fourth meeting (Bratislava, May 1998), the Conference of the Parties considered a
synthesis
of the information contained in the 86 reports received prior to that meeting. The meeting asked SBSTTA to provide advice on the intervals and form of future national reports, including the nature of the information needed from Parties in order to assess the status of implementation of the Convention, recommendations on improving the reporting process, and identification of ways and means to facilitate national implementation (
decision IV/14
).
Second National Reports
At the fifth meeting of SBSTTA (Montreal, January-February 2000), participants considered guidelines for future national reporting that had been developed by the Secretariat through a pilot project, carried out with the collaboration of a number of Parties, to identify a methodology for assessing the state of implementation of the Convention. This involved (i) identifying the obligations on Parties deriving from the provisions of the Convention and the decisions of the Conference of the Parties, and (ii) formulating these as questions designed to elicit responses that would reveal the level of implementation, relative priorities, constraints encountered and issues not yet addressed. At its fifth meeting (Nairobi, May 2000), the Conference of the Parties endorsed this format as a guide for future national reporting and as a means by which the status of national implementation can be measured (
decision V/19
). Parties were requested to submit their second national reports by
15 May 2001
for consideration at the sixth meeting of the Conference of the Parties in April 2002.
The fifth meeting of the Conference of the Parties agreed that national reports would be called for on a four-yearly basis and considered at alternate meetings of the Conference of the Parties
.
Third National Reports
At its sixth meeting (The Hague, April 2002), the Conference of the Parties considered a
full assessment of information
contained in second national reports received by the end of January 2002, and requested the Executive Secretary to prepare a draft format for the third national reports for the consideration of the Conference of the Parties at its seventh meeting (
decision VI/25
). Building on the methodology and format used for the second national reports, the format for the third national reports would, among other things, include questions on strategic objectives and goals established under the
Strategic Plan
, focus on allowing the Parties to provide information on the experience of implementing their national biodiversity strategies and action plans, and facilitate the identification of obstacles and impediments to implementation.
At its seventh meeting (Kuala Lumpur, February 2004), the Conference of the Parties considered an
analysis of information
contained in the second national reports that were received by the end of October 2003. The meeting also endorsed the format for the third national report, as amended, with respect to the questionnaire on forest biological diversity and requested the Executive Secretary to further develop the format by considering the views expressed during the meeting and the data required from Parties to assess the implementation of the Strategic Plan and the
2010 Biodiversity Target
. The revised format for the third national report was transmitted to Parties in July 2004 who were requested to submit their completed report to the Executive Secretary by
15 May 2005
for the consideration of the eighth meeting of the Conference of the Parties in 2006 (
decision VII/25
).
Fourth National Reports
At its eighth meeting (Curitiba, March 2006), the Conference of the Parties considered a
preliminary synthesis of information
contained in the third national reports that had been received by the end of October 2005. The meeting also endorsed the guidelines for the fourth national report that had been prepared according to guidance provided by the first meeting of the
Working Group on Review of Implementation
(
recommendation I/9
). Consideration was also given to relevant views expressed by Parties at the eighth meeting and further comments submitted by some Parties. In accordance with
Decision VIII/14
, Parties were requested to submit their fourth national report by
30 March 2009
.
The fourth national report provided an important opportunity to assess progress towards the 2010 Biodiversity Target, drawing upon an analysis of the current status and trends in biodiversity and actions taken to implement the Convention at the national level, as well as to consider what further efforts are needed. The details of this assessment are presented in the
third edition of the Global Biodiversity Outlook
published in 2010.
The
guidelines
for the fourth national reports were developed based on the experience and lessons learned from previous reporting processes under the Convention, in particular from the second and third national reports. The multiple-choice questionnaire, the main format adopted for these earlier reports, has proven less helpful than expected for review and decision-making processes under the Convention, focusing too narrowly on COP decisions addressed to Parties rather than providing a complete picture of national implementation. Consequently, the guidelines for the NR4 requested Parties to report on national implementation of the Convention primarily in narrative form, and to complement concise narrative substantive reporting with tables, figures or graphics.
Fifth National Reports
In
decision X/10
, the Conference of the Parties requested Parties to submit their
fifth national report
by
31 March 2014
. The fifth national reports will provide an important source of information for a mid-term review of progress towards the implementation of the
Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020
and progress towards the
Aichi Biodiversity Targets
which will be undertaken by the Conference of the Parties at its twelfth meeting in the second half of 2014. The fifth national reports will also contribute to the development of the fourth edition of the Global Biodiversity Outlook. Further, the fifth national report guidelines request Parties to report on contributions to the relevant 2015 Targets of the Millennium Development Goals.
The format of the fifth national report is the same as that adopted for the fourth national report (i.e. concise narrative substantive reporting complemented by tables, figures or graphics) however Parties are encouraged to emphasize the use of indicators, including the global headline indicators contained in
decision VIII/15
, to measure progress towards the Aichi Biodiversity Targets and report thereon in the fifth national report.
Further information is available at the
Fifth National Report Information Portal
.
Feedback
Site Map
Contact us
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Credits
© CBD Secretariat
Rate this page