• Search IconSearch
  • Language Icon English
    • English
    • Español (Spanish)
    • Français (French)
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • Русский (Russian)
    • 中文 (Chinese)
Convention of Biological Diversity Logo
Convention of Biological Diversity Logo
  • Options
    • Search IconSearch
    • Language Icon English
      • English
      • Español (Spanish)
      • Français (French)
      • العربية (Arabic)
      • Русский (Russian)
      • 中文 (Chinese)
    • Login IconLogin
    • Settings IconSettings
Warning
  • About
  • Governance
  • Parties
  • Resources
  • Key Protocol Issues
    • ABS Clearing-House and information-sharing
    • Assessment and Review
    • Awareness Raising
    • Capacity Building and Development
    • Compliance with the Protocol
    • Cooperation & Partnerships
    • Digital Sequence Information
    • Financial Mechanism
    • Global Multilateral Benefit-Sharing Mechanism
    • Model Contractual Clauses
    • Monitoring and Reporting
    • Resource Mobilization
    • Specialized International ABS Instruments
  • ABS Clearing-House and information-sharing
  • Assessment and Review
  • Awareness Raising
  • Capacity Building and Development
  • Compliance with the Protocol
  • Cooperation & Partnerships
  • Digital Sequence Information
  • Financial Mechanism
  • Global Multilateral Benefit-Sharing Mechanism
  • Model Contractual Clauses
  • Monitoring and Reporting
  • Resource Mobilization
  • Specialized International ABS Instruments
  • Assessment and Review
    • Summary
    • Decisions
    • Documents
    • Notifications
    • First Assessment and Review
    • Second Assessment and Review
    1. home
    2. Nagoya Protocol
    3. Key Protocol Issues
    4. Assessment and Review
    5. Decisions

    COP-MOP Decisions

    • Decision NP-5/5 on Methodology for the second assessment and review of the effectiveness of the Protocol
    • Decision NP-3/1 on assessment and review of the effectiveness of the Protocol (Article 31)
    • Decision NP-2/4 on assessment and review of the effectiveness of the Protocol (Article 31)
    • Decision NP-1/3 on monitoring and reporting (Article 29)
    Warning