Aichi Target Pages

Aichi Target 3

By 2020, at the latest, incentives, including subsidies, harmful to biodiversity are eliminated, phased out or reformed in order to minimize or avoid negative impacts, and positive incentives for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity are developed and applied, consistent and in harmony with the Convention and other relevant international obligations, taking into account national socio economic conditions.

Global Status

   
1%
0%
3%
19%
12%
0%
62%
JavaScript chart by amCharts 3.21.15JS chart by amCharts

National Status and National Targets

JavaScript chart by amCharts 3.21.15EUJS map by amCharts
Disclaimer
Export Data
Back to Map
1. Norwegian ecosystems will achieve good status and deliver ecosystem services
17. NBSAPs

View Record Also related to:
11. By 2020, maximizing the extent of areas where sustainable farming is taking place through the biodiversity-related measures of the Common Agricultural Policy (agri-environmental management payments, Natura 2000 compensations payments, etc.) and which contribute to agro-biodiversity, and the maintenance and improvement of biological diversity

View Record Also related to:
12. Al 2022 el Estado de Guatemala proporciona los recursos humanos y financieros necesarios para mantener la viabilidad social y ambiental y un desarrollo sostenible que permite conservar y utilizar sosteniblemente la diversidad biológica.
11. Protected areas, 14. Essential ecosystem services

View Record Also related to:
Advanced Search
1 - 3 of 124
Loading...
JavaScript chart by amCharts 3.21.15Unknow (2/196)Moving Away (1/196)No Progress (7/196)Insufficient Rate (39/196)Meeting Target (24/196)Exceeding Target (1/196)Not Reported (122/196)

Info!


The color displayed on the map indicates how the country has assessed progress towards their national targets associated with the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. Where a country has more than one national target associated with an Aichi Biodiversity Target, the average of these assessments is used to generate the overall level of progress achieved towards the Aichi Biodiversity Target. This average value considers mapping to the “Main related Aichi Biodiversity Target” only. For the complete details on how a country has assessed progress towards its national targets, please see the sixth national report of the country.

The information presented in the pie chart and map above is drawn from the sixth national reports that have been submitted using the online reporting tool. Data from the sixth national reports that have been submitted “offline” in PDF are not integrated (the offline reports can be accessed at https://www.cbd.int/reports/).

Resources

20 Years of BioTrade: Connecting People, the Planet and Markets
(Case study/good practice/lessons learned)
BioTrade and access and benefit sharing policymakers and regulators: From concept to practice
(Case study/good practice/lessons learned)
The Interface between access and benefIt-sharIng rules and BioTrade
(Case study/good practice/lessons learned)
Advanced Search
1 - 3 of 38
Loading...

Implementation Measures and Outcomes

Title
Ecuador — The National Program on Incentives for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Natural Heritage ("Socio Bosque") was created in January 2014. (NBSAP)
Pakistan — The subsidy on electricity for farm tube wells, which was a major cause of ground water depletion, has been withdrawn. (NBSAP)
Solomon Islands — Renewable energy, such as solar energy, has been introduced to villages to reduce dependency on lowland forest for fuels under UNFCCC implementation. (NBSAP)
Mauritius — NBSAP 2017-2025 assigns high priority and has defined activities, with Key Performance Indicators, to implement National Target 3 'By 2025, the incentives, including subsidies, harmful to biodiversity across all sectors have been assessed and practical pathways for incentives to reward pro‐biodiversity practices and outcomes by all stakeholders, including the private sector, are being implemented'. (NBSAP)
Islamic Republic of Iran — Strategic Goal 4 'Integrated conservation of biodiversity' of NBSAP 2016-2030 indicates that actions will be carried out to develop and strengthen economic incentives to encourage appropriate private sector investment in biodiversity management and conservation (e.g. green tax incentives). (NBSAP)
Samoa — NBSAP 2015-2020 encourages the exploration of payment of ecosystem services, including those on land under customary control, as incentives to reinforce community participation and commitment to conservation objectives, and to demonstrate the links between conservation, sustainable use and the livelihoods of local resource owners. (NBSAP)
Montenegro — Strategic Target C of NBSAP 2016-2020 aims to establish a legal, institutional and implementation framework for introducing PES by 2020. (NBSAP)
Peru — The Action Plan 2014-2018 aimed to have adequate incentives, developed and coordinated across sectors and between levels of government, for engaging the private sector in biodiversity conservation initiatives, by the end of the first half of 2015. (NBSAP)
Belgium — A new operational objective addressed in Strategy 2020 aims to phase out perverse incentives, with consideration given to the guidelines on the integration of the values of biodiversity and ecosystem services in development strategies, planning processes and reporting systems. (NBSAP)
Ghana — A strategy has been put in place to accelerate the process of removal of harmful incentives to biodiversity. Ghana Target 3 (2020), which the country is on track to achieve, aimed to first identify harmful incentives that drive biodiversity loss and degradation and then develop a mechanism for eliminating or phasing out those incentives. (6NR)
Bhutan — - The country has conducted a study on harmful incentives on natural resources, including the rural timber subsidy and agriculture subsidies. It has also prioritized programmes to become a fully organic country. (6NR)
Armenia — The Law on 'Making Amendments and Modifications to the Republic of Armenia Law on Compensation Tariffs for the Damage Caused to the Fauna and Flora as a Result of Environmental Offenses' was adopted by Government in 2017. (6NR)
Antigua and Barbuda — The Ministry of Health, Wellness and the Environment, that banned plastic bags and styrofoam containers, has waived taxes on the importation of alternatives such as reusable bags and plant-based containers. (6NR)
Switzerland — The country is on track to achieve Strategic Goal 5 (evaluation of financial incentives) contained in the Biodiversity Strategy (2012) and regularly evaluates the impacts of incentives on biodiversity. For example, during the development of the Biodiversity Action Plan (2017), FOEN commissioned a study on existing financial incentives with negative impacts on biodiversity which identified at national level a set of incentives with potentially negative impacts and recommended further work on specific issues, such as tourism infrastructure. Another example relates to the agricultural sector where some progress in reforming incentives (e.g. direct payments for husbandry have been phased out) has been achieved over the last years. The Confederation will present an overall evaluation of the impacts of federal subsidies and other incentives with consequences for biodiversity at the end of Implementation Phase I (2023). (6NR)
Advanced Search

Partners

Side-events

ID Title Year
No records found
Advanced Search
1 - of
Loading...