Error as occured...

Side Event #7785

Status: SCHEDULED

Date Thursday
2026.10.22 @ 18:15
Add to Calendar
Room Sisian - Eastern European States meeting room

Capacity: 160 people
Conference COP-17 / CP-MOP-12 / NP-MOP-06
Meetings(s)
COP-17
Seventeenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity
Title From assessment to action: putting equitable governance into practice under Target 3
Hosts
IIED | ORG WAITING FOR APPROVAL | Kenya Wildlife Conservancies Association | ORG WAITING FOR APPROVAL | ORG WAITING FOR APPROVAL | ORG WAITING FOR APPROVAL | ORG WAITING FOR APPROVAL |
Topics
Protected Areas and OECMs
Indigenous peoples and local communities
Stakeholder Engagement and Cooperation
Implementation, Monitoring and Reporting
Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework
Capacity-building and Development
Indicators
Planning
Reporting
Traditional Knowledge, Innovations and Practices
Youth
South-South Cooperation
 

 

This side-event will present practical experiences from conservation organisations in assessing and improving equitable governance at protected and conserved areas (PCSs) across five countries. Target 3 commits CBD Parties to ensure PCAs are equitably governed by 2030. Yet many countries, conservation organisations and PCA managers still face the practical challenge of how to move from this global commitment to meaningful changes in how governance is assessed, improved and reported. This event focuses on that implementation gap, sharing lessons on how site-based assessment can inform local action, system-level learning and national reporting. 

The implementing partners of the Darwin Initiative-funded “Scaling-up Equitable Governance in Area-based conservation” project (SEGA for short) will share their experiences and learnings from systematically assessing equitable governance across PCAs of different governance types, supporting locally-developed action plans, informing system-level policy and providing data for national reporting. The partners are using the SAGE tool that is listed as a suggested indicator towards Target 3, further improving its methodology, and building national communities of practice for transformative action at scale. 

Join us for this panel session to hear from experiences across Bolivia, Kenya, Madagascar, Nepal and Tanzania. The event will encourage Parties, national reporting leads, conservation organisations, funders and IP and LC community partners to treat equitable governance not as a vague principle, but an actionable part of Target 3. They will leave with practical lessons on how to assess, improve and report on equitable governance. 

Provisional Format 

In the first half, the SEGA partners will share exemplary learnings on different aspects of improving equitable governance at the site-level and at scale, such as: 

  • How specific actions can help improve mistrust identified through assessment in community-based conservation in Madagascar 
  • Identifying barriers to improving governance and equity in practice in Bolivia  
  • Building communities of practice for honest reflection and collaborative learning in Tanzania 
  • System-level learning through systematic assessment across wildlife conservancies in Kenya 
  • Informing national and regional policy to better support equitable governance in Nepal 
  • Generating new initiatives to revitalise shared governance in National Parks in Madagascar to meet national commitments and report against them 

This will be followed by an open discussion moderated by IIED and structured around the three questions of how assessments can lead to action at the site-level, learning at the system-level, and reporting for the global level.

Error as occured...
File Title & Description Tags

From assessment to action: how SAGE enables local solutions for equitable governance in conservation


Equitable governance has become a central objective of global conservation policy, with frameworks such as the Convention on Biological Diversity's (CBD) Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework requiring that all protected and conserved areas be ‘equitably governed’ by 2030. Yet a persistent gap remains between these high-level commitments and what is happening on the ground. How equity is understood, and the kinds of practical solutions that actors see as feasible, often vary widely across local contexts. This research presents a thematic analysis of 2,252 actions proposed through 49 Site-level Assessments of Governance and Equity (SAGE) of protected and conserved areas across 19 countries. These actions were suggested by Indigenous Peoples, local communities, protected area managers, government authorities and nongovernmental organisations as practical strategies to address identified governance challenges through SAGE’s participatory, actor‑led methodology. Spanning 20 categories, the actions range from fundamental to transformational.

22710iied

 

Insights from equitable governance assessments in conservation areas around the world


Global policy commitments to ensure that protected and conserved areas (PCAs) are equitably governed have increased interest in empirically assessing and analyzing social equity. Although numerous assessments have been conducted in individual PCAs, there is limited empirical insight into equity as a multidimensional concept beyond the site level. We investigated the distributional, procedural, and recognitional equity challenges associated with the governance of PCAs and determined whether the identified challenges differed according to governance type and actor group. We conducted a meta-level analysis of equitable governance assessments conducted at 37 PCAs in 19 countries that form part of the new SAGE (Site-level Assessment of Governance and Equity) database. SAGE is a participatory tool for site-level actors to systematically discuss and assess equity dynamics at their PCAs. We found a large variation in assessment results across the sites. Mitigating the negative impacts of conservation on local communities was most often identified as the biggest challenge. In general, equity assessments tended to be slightly more positive for PCAs governed by and with Indigenous Peoples and local communities than those governed purely by government agencies. Evaluations of different actors often revealed substantial differences in opinion on specific governance issues. In particular, evaluations of PCA decision-makers tended to be more positive than those of PCA users. As an early-stage exploration of the growing SAGE database, our findings provide proof of concept that tools for assessing and improving PCA governance gain value from taking multidimensional approaches and need to consider different actors’ views. Although the growing SAGE database holds potential for further insights on how equity is perceived across governance types, ecosystems, and geographical regions, the primary objective of SAGE needs to remain understanding and advancing equity at the site level.

cobi.70101

 

SAGE and its early contributions to improvements in governance of area-based conservation


This report provides case study research to assess the effectiveness of the SAGE methodology to improve environmental governance of area-based conservation (that is, protected and/or conserved areas (PCAs)). SAGE, or Site-level Assessment of Governance and Equity, uses a multi-actor process where key actors lead the assessment of governance and equity of conservation efforts, as well as the planning, implementation and monitoring of actions to improve governance.

21316iied

 

Error as occured...
File Title & Description Tags


 

Error as occured...
File Title & Description Tags


 

Documents