ar
|
en
|
es
|
fr
|
ru
العربية
|
English
|
Español
|
Français
|
Русский
Sign up for an account
|
Sign In
The Convention
About the Convention
History of the Convention
Convention Text
List of Parties
Decisions
Global Biodiversity Outlook (GBO 4)
Convention Protocols
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety
Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-Sharing
Convention Bodies
Conference of the Parties (COP)
Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA)
Subsidiary Body on Implementation (SBI)
Working Group on Article 8(j)
Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020
Key Elements
Aichi Biodiversity Targets
Implementation
United Nations Decade on Biodiversity 2011-2020
Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework
Mechanisms for Implementation
National Biodiversity Strategies & Action Plans
National Reports
Financial Resources & Mechanism
Clearing-House Mechanism (CHM)
Capacity Building
Technical and Scientific Cooperation
Cooperation & Partnerships
South-South Cooperation
Consortium of Scientific Partners
Rio Conventions
Biodiversity-related Conventions
Japan Biodiversity Fund
Partnership Agreements
Cartagena Protocol
The Cartagena Protocol
What's new
About the Protocol
Text of the Cartagena Protocol
Strategic Plan
Nagoya – Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress
Key Protocol Issues
Assessment and Review
Capacity Building
Compliance
Financial Mechanism
Mainstreaming
Handling, Transport, Packaging and Identification
Information sharing
Monitoring and Reporting
Public Awareness and Participation
Risk Assessment
Risk Management
Roster of Experts
Socio-economic Considerations
Transit and Contained Use
Unintentional Transboundary Movements
Parties
List of Parties
Becoming a Party
National Contacts
National Reports
Status of Contributions
COP-MOP (Governing Body)
COP-MOP Bureau
COP-MOP Meetings
COP-MOP Decisions
Activities and Documentation
Meetings and Documents
Notifications
Reports of the Executive Secretary
Resources
The Biosafety Clearing-House
Frequently Asked Questions
Media and Outreach
A video on the Cartagena Protocol
Search the BIRC
Publications
Protocols and decisions
Fact Sheets and Banners
Newsletter
Biosafety Technical Series
Other Publications
The Biosafety Clearing-House (BCH)
Nagoya Protocol
Programmes
Thematic Programmes
Agricultural Biodiversity
Dry and Sub-humid Land Biodiversity
Forest Biodiversity
Inland Waters Biodiversity
Island Biodiversity
Marine and Coastal Biodiversity
Mountain Biodiversity
Major Groups
Cities and Local Governments
Parliamentarians
Business
Universities and the Scientific Community
Children & Youth
The Green Wave for Schools
Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs)
Cross-Cutting Issues
Aichi Biodiversity Targets
Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit-sharing
Biological and Cultural Diversity
Biodiversity for Development
Capacity Building
Climate Change and Biodiversity
Communication, Education and Public Awareness
Economics, Trade and Incentive Measures
Ecosystem Approach
Ecosystem Restoration
Gender and Biodiversity
Global Strategy for Plant Conservation
Global Taxonomy Initiative
Health & Biodiversity
Impact Assessment
Identification, Monitoring, Indicators and Assessments
Invasive Alien Species
Liability and Redress - Article 14.2
New & Emerging Issues
Peace and Biodiversity Dialogue Initiative
Protected Areas
Sustainable Use of Biodiversity
Technical and Scientific Cooperation
Technology Transfer
Tourism and Biodiversity
Traditional Knowledge, Innovations and Practices - Article 8(j)
Information
News and Communications
CBD Announcements
Statements
Notifications
News Headlines on Biodiversity
Press Releases
RSS Feeds
Twitter
Facebook
Discussion Forums
National Information
Country Profiles
List of Parties
Lists of National Focal Points
National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAPs)
National Reports
Status of Contributions
Multimedia
Photo Gallery
Video Gallery
YouTube
General References
Decisions
Recommendations
Meetings
Library and Documents
Principles, Guidelines and Tools
Resources for Negotiators
ECOLEX - A Gateway to Biodiversity-Related Law
Case Studies
Related Websites
Partnership Agreements
Thematic Databases
Ecosystem Approach Sourcebook
Database on Climate Change Adaptation
Database on Incentive Measures
Database of Scientific Assessments
Database on Technology Transfer
Case Studies on Impact Assessment
Case Studies on Dry and Sub-Humid Land Biodiversity
ABS Database on Capacity Building Projects
ABS Roster of Experts
Secretariat
About the Secretariat
Division
Museum of Nature and Culture
Initiatives
Secretariat Documents
Employment Opportunities
Doing Business with the CBD
Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020
Key Elements
Aichi Biodiversity Targets
Technical Rationale (and Quick Guides)
Target 1
Target 2
Target 3
Target 4
Target 5
Target 6
Target 7
Target 8
Target 9
Target 10
Target 11
Target 12
Target 13
Target 14
Target 15
Target 16
Target 17
Target 18
Target 19
Target 20
Implementation
Indicators
Actions
Quick Guides for the Aichi Biodiversity Targets
Aichi Biodiversity Targets Icons
National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAPs)
Latest NBSAPs submitted
National Reports
National Targets
Meetings and Documents
Briefing Sessions
Notifications
Inputs for revising and updating the Strategic Plan 2002-2010
UN Decade on Biodiversity
>
Convention
>
Strategic Plan 2011-2020
>
Aichi-Targets
>
Rationale
>
Target 9
TARGET 9 - Technical Rationale extended (provided in document COP/10/INF/12/Rev.1)
Quick Guide (Target 9)
(
EN
, ES, FR)
More
>>
Strategic Goal B: Reduce the direct pressures on biodiversity and promote sustainable use.
Target 9: By 2020, invasive alien species and pathways are identified and prioritized, priority species are controlled or eradicated and measures are in place to manage pathways to prevent their introduction and establishment
Technical rationale:
Invasive alien species are those alien species which threaten ecosystems, habitats or species (Article 8(h)). They are a major threat to biodiversity and ecosystem services, as identified by most Parties in their fourth national reports. They often have a particularly detrimental effect in island ecosystems. In some ecosystems, such as many island ecosystems, invasive alien species are the leading cause of biodiversity loss. In addition, invasive alien species can pose a threat to food security, human health and economic development. Increasing trade and travel means the threat is likely to increase unless additional action is taken.
32
Implementation:
Pathways for the introduction of invasive alien species can be addressed through improved border controls and quarantine, including through better coordination with national and regional bodies responsible for plant and animal health, as well as through early warning mechanisms, rapid response measures and management plans. Given the multiple pathways for invasive species introductions and that multiple alien species are already present in many countries it will be necessary to prioritize control and eradication efforts to those species and pathways which will have the greatest impact on biodiversity and/or which are the most resource effective to address. Work initiated by the International Plant Protection Convention, the International Organization for Animal Health (OIE), and the World Trade Organization’s Committee on the Agreement for the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures and its Standards and Trade Development Facility, could also be built upon when taking actions to meet this target. The Global Invasive Species Programme has also developed several tools. Of the Convention’s programmes of work, that dealing with invasive alien species is the most relevant to this target, however, given the particularly acute impact of invasive alien species on island ecosystems, the programme of work on island biodiversity is also relevant. Actions to implement the International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships' Ballast Water and Sediments, a convention adopted through the International Maritime Organization which seeks to prevent the spread of organisms carried in ships' ballast water, could also help to achieve progress towards this target.
Indicators and baseline information:
Process indicators for this target could include the number of countries with national invasive species policies, strategies and action plans, and the number of countries which have ratified international agreements and standards related to the prevention and control of invasive alien species. One outcome-oriented indicator is trends in invasive alien species while other possible indicators could include the status of alien species invasion, and the Red List Index for impacts of invasive alien species. While well-developed and globally-applicable indicators are lacking, some basic methodologies do exist which can serve as a starting point for further monitoring or provide baseline information.
33
The work undertaken by the Global Invasive Species Programme, as well as by IUCN’s Invasive Species Specialist Group, could be useful starting points in this regard. Further, many countries do have data on invasions and pest outbreaks and therefore national-level targets might be developed.
Milestones:
Options for milestones for this target include:
By 2014, potential pathways for invasive alien species are identified using a risk assessment framework, and lists of the most harmful invasive species are developed;
* By 2014 action plans are developed and relevant legislation is reviewed;
By 2016, actions have been taken to address the most important introduction pathways and the most serious invasions;
By 2020, the measures which have been put in place have been assessed to determine their impact.
32
Hulme, P E (2009). Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46(1), 10-18.
33
McGeoch, M A, et al. (2010). Global indicators of biological invasion: species numbers, biodiversity impact and policy responses. Diversity and Distributions, 16(1), 95-108.
Feedback
Site Map
Contact us
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Credits
© CBD Secretariat
Rate this page